Purpose Hypovitaminosis D is a highly spread condition correlated with increased risk of respiratory tract infections. Nowadays, the world is in the grip of the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID 19) pandemic. In these patients, cytokine storm is associated with disease severity. In consideration of the role of vitamin D in the immune system, aim of this study was to analyse vitamin D levels in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and to assess any correlations with disease severity and prognosis. Methods In this retrospective, observational study, we analysed demographic, clinical and laboratory data of 42 patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, treated in Respiratory Intermediate Care Unit (RICU) of the Policlinic of Bari from March, 11 to April 30, 2020. Results Eighty one percent of patients had hypovitaminosis D. Based on vitamin D levels, the population was stratified into four groups: no hypovitaminosis D, insufficiency, moderate deficiency, and severe deficiency. No differences regarding demographic and clinical characteristics were found. A survival analysis highlighted that, after 10 days of hospitalization, severe vitamin D deficiency patients had a 50% mortality probability, while those with vitamin D ≥ 10 ng/mL had a 5% mortality risk ( p = 0.019). Conclusions High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was found in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure, treated in a RICU. Patients with severe vitamin D deficiency had a significantly higher mortality risk. Severe vitamin D deficiency may be a marker of poor prognosis in these patients, suggesting that adjunctive treatment might improve disease outcomes.
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the prevalence of sleep breathing disorders, loud snoring and excessive daytime sleepiness in a group of obese subjects, and to identify the predictors of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity in these patients. SUBJECTS: A total of 161 consecutive obese patients (body mass index (BMI) ! 30.0 kgam 2 ), ranging between 30.0 and 67.3, represented by 57 men and 104 women, aged 16 ± 75 y. Forty (15 men and 25 women) age-matched (20 ± 70 y) nonobese (BMI`27 kgam 2 ) volunteers were also recruited for the study. MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory function parameters, nocturnal sleep quality (evaluated by a speci®c questionnaire), nocturnal hypoventilation and OSA (evaluated by night polysomnography) were examined in all subjects. Anthropometric parameters (neck circumference, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio) were also investigated. RESULTS: Eighty-three obese patients (51.5% of the obese group) had a respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ! 10, corresponding to a moderate or severe sleep apnea. In particular, 24.8% (40a161), ie a quarter of all obese patients, were affected by severe OSA and this alteration was present in 42.1% of obese men (24a57) and in 15.4% (16a104) of obese women. When a stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed, neck circumference in men and BMI in women were shown to be the strongest predictors of sleep apnea. Twenty-nine percent of all obese subjects (40.3% of men and 23.1% of women) showed nocturnal hypoventilation; however, it was present as a unique breathing alteration in only 5% of the obese population. The percentage of patients having excessive daytime sleepiness was signi®cantly higher than in nonobese subjects, even when only nonapneic obese patients were considered (P`0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that OSA is present in more than 50% of a population of obese patients with a mean BMI higher than 40.0, this percentage being much higher than that commonly reported in previous studies, particularly in women. Neck circumference in men and BMI in women seem to be the strongest predictors of the severity of OSA in obese patients. Nocturnal hypoventilation seems to be present in more than 29% of a severe obese population. Moreover, this study indicates that morbid obesity can be associated with excessive daytime sleepiness even in the absence of sleep apnea.
Norovirus outbreaks were associated with significant concurrent increases in all-cause hospitalization and mortality in nursing homes.
In 2012, a multistate outbreak of Campylobacter infections associated with unpasteurized milk resulted in 148 illnesses. A dairy with a Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture unpasteurized milk permit and minimal deficiencies identified during inspection was the outbreak source, demonstrating the ongoing hazards of unpasteurized dairy products.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that government expenditures on non-health care services can reduce infant mortality, but it is unclear what types of spending have the greatest impact among groups at highest risk. Thus, we sought to quantify how US state government spending on various services impacted infant mortality rates (IMRs) over time and whether spending differentially reduced mortality in some subpopulations. METHODS:A longitudinal, repeated-measures study of US state-level infant mortality and state and local government spending for the years 2000-2016, the most recent data available. Expenditures included spending on education, social services, and environment and housing. Using generalized linear regression models, we assessed how changes in spending impacted infant mortality over time, overall and stratified by race and ethnicity and maternal age group.RESULTS: State and local governments spend, on average, $9 per person. A $0.30 per-person increase in environmental spending was associated with a decrease of 0.03 deaths per 1000 live births, and a $0.73 per-person increase in social services spending was associated with a decrease of 0.02 deaths per 1000 live births. Infants born to mothers aged ,20 years had the single greatest benefit from an increase in expenditures compared with all other groups. Increased expenditures in public health, housing, parks and recreation, and solid waste management were associated with the greatest reduction in overall IMR.CONCLUSIONS: Investment in non-health care services was associated with lower IMRs among certain high-risk populations. Continued investments into improved social and environmental services hold promise for further reducing IMR disparities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.