Transporter proteins in biological membranes may be divided into channels and carriers. Channels function as selective pores that open in response to a chemical or electrophysiological stimulus, allowing movement of a solute down an electrochemical gradient. Active carrier proteins use an energy producing process to translocate a substrate against a concentration gradient. Secondary active transporters use the movement of a solute down a concentration gradient to drive the translocation of another substrate across a membrane. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters couple hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to the translocation of various substrates across cell membranes. High-resolution three-dimensional structures have now been reported from X-ray crystallographic studies of six different transporters, including two ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. These structures have explained the results from many previous biochemical and biological studies and shed new light on their functional mechanisms. All these transporters have ␣-helical structures of the membrane-spanning domains, as suggested from many previous studies, and some of the helices have irregular shapes with kinks and bends.Together these crystal structures demonstrate the large flexibility of transporter proteins and that substantial movements take place during the substrate translocation process, which to a certain extent may distinguish active carriers from channel proteins. These structures and other low-resolution structures of membrane proteins have served as a basis for construction of three-dimensional protein models that have provided insight into functional mechanisms and molecular structures and enabled formulation of new hypotheses regarding transporter structure and function, which may be experimentally validated.Twelve years ago a review article described the growth of information on transporters as a "transporter explosion" (Uhl and Hartig, 1992). Since then, genome sequencing has made information on transporters expand in magnitude at an even more rapid rate, and the amount of information on their structures and functional mechanisms seems to have grown exponentially. A transporter protein classification system (TC) proposed in 1999 was based on phylogenetic analysis and functional properties of about 250 families of sequencerelated transporters identified in bacteria, archaea, and eu-

The two main groups of antidepressant drugs, the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), as well as several other compounds, act by inhibiting the serotonin transporter (SERT). However, the binding mode and molecular mechanism of inhibition in SERT are not fully understood. In this study, five classes of SERT inhibitors were docked into an outward-facing SERT homology model using a new 4D ensemble docking protocol. Unlike other docking protocols, where protein flexibility is not considered or is highly dependent on the ligand structure, flexibility was here obtained by side chain sampling of the amino acids of the binding pocket using biased probability Monte Carlo (BPMC) prior to docking. This resulted in the generation of multiple binding pocket conformations that the ligands were docked into. The docking results showed that the inhibitors were stacked between the aromatic amino acids of the extracellular gate (Y176, F335) presumably preventing its closure. The inhibitors interacted with amino acids in both the putative substrate binding site and more extracellular regions of the protein. A general structure–docking-based pharmacophore model was generated to explain binding of all studied classes of SERT inhibitors. Docking of a test set of actives and decoys furthermore showed that the outward-facing ensemble SERT homology model consistently and selectively scored the majority of active compounds above decoys, which indicates its usefulness in virtual screening.

The dopamine (DAT), serotontin (SERT) and noradrenalin (NET) transporters are molecular targets for different classes of psychotropic drugs. The crystal structure of Aquifex aeolicus LeuT(Aa) was used as a template for molecular modeling of DAT, SERT and NET, and two putative drug binding sites (pocket 1 and 2) in each transporter were identified. Cocaine was docked into binding pocket 1 of DAT, corresponding to the leucine binding site in LeuT(Aa), which involved transmembrane helices (TMHs) 1, 3, 6 and 8. Clomipramine was docked into binding pocket 2 of DAT, involving TMHs 1, 3, 6, 10 and 11, and extracellular loops 4 and 6, corresponding to the clomipramine binding site in a crystal structure of a LeuT(Aa)-clomipramine complex. The structures of the proposed cocaine- and tricyclic antidepressant-binding sites may be of particular interest for the design of novel DAT interacting ligands.

The Sav1866 X-ray structure may serve as a suitable template for the ABCB1 model, as it did with ABCC5. The EPS in the substrate translocation chambers and the positive-negative ratio of charged amino acids were in accordance with the transport of cationic amphiphilic and lipophilic substrates by ABCB1, and the transport of organic anions by ABCC5.

The present paper reviews and discusses selectivity of ABCC4 (MRP4), ABCC5 (MRP5) and ABCC11 (MRP8) as cellular efflux pumps for cAMP and cGMP. These transporters are potential drug targets for selective modulation of cyclic nucleotide action.