No abstract

This article examines the National Plan for Mental Health and Substance Use Work (the MIELI plan), published in Finland in 2009. We place the plan into a wider context of changes in Finnish social and health services and have also studied responses to the plan. The data is provided by national documents, complemented by an online enquiry and some journal articles as feedback material. The MIELI plan is implemented in conjunction with a municipal and service system reform in Finland. While the proposals of the plan clearly carry a potential for change in the treatment system, there are also great challenges. For instance, to what extent can this kind of plan influence reality? Can the proposals really change anything in the treatment system, or does the potential change emerge from elsewhere? Responses to the plan indicate that referral-free access to treatment, the principle of a single entry point and primary-level services in general were considered important proposals in the MIELI plan. At the other end of the scale, the implementation of the plan and its medical orientation were received less positively.

This study was designed to explore the effect of nitrous oxide (N2O) on the amount of middle ear effusion. Seventy-six children referred for adenoidectomy or tympanostomy tube placement were divided into two groups in the basis of the method of anesthesia. One group of 39 children was ventilated with a mixture of 30% oxygen and 70% nitrous oxide, while the other group of 37 patients was ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air. The amounts of middle ear effusion obtained in myringotomy were weighed and compared between these groups. Preoperative and perioperative tympanograms were performed. Ventilation with nitrous oxide caused a distinct rise in middle ear pressure. The amount of the middle ear effusion, however, remained the same in the two groups. It is concluded that the operating surgeon can rely on the myringotomy finding even when nitrous oxide anesthesia is used.

Aims: Both survey and healthcare register data struggle as data sources to capture the phenomenon of alcohol problems. We study a large group of people for whom survey data and two types of register data are available, and examine the overlaps of similar or related measures in the different data sources to learn about potential weaknesses in each. We also examine how register-based data on the prevalence of alcohol problems change depending on which register data are used. Design: We use data from the Regional Health and Wellbeing Study (ATH) of the adult Finnish population collected in 2013 and 2014 ( n = 69,441), individually linked with data on two national healthcare registers (Care Register for Health Care; Register of Primary Health Care visits) for the survey year and previous year. Results: The prevalence of substance-abuse-related healthcare was almost two-fold if data on outpatient primary care visits were included in addition to hospitalisations. Forty-six per cent of the survey respondents self-reporting substance-abuse-related healthcare service use were identified in the registers, and 22% of all respondents with such service use according to registers reported this in the survey. Records of substance-abuse-related healthcare service use, controlled for self-reported alcohol use and self-reported substance-abuse-related service use, were found more often for men, the middle-aged, people with basic education only, and the non-employed. Conclusions: The results are suggestive of underreporting in both data sources. There is an evident need to develop recording practices in the healthcare registers regarding substance use disorders.

No abstract