Os avanços da Internet, e em particular das redes sociais digitais, têm estimulado de forma decisiva a aprendizagem, para além das estruturas educativas formais. Com a Web 2.0 e com o crescimento das redes sociais como o Facebook, o Twitter ou o YouTube, a ênfase tem sido colocada na aprendizagem em rede e nas potencialidades do designado software social para acesso à informação e ao conhecimento, bem como na capacidade para trabalhar e aprender com os outros numa colaboração global criativa fora das estruturas educacionais convencionais marcada pelo desejo de ligar os mundos da aprendizagem formal e informal. Neste contexto de networking social o número de youtubers tem crescido de uma forma vertiginosa, sendo que alguns destes têm criado canais e vídeos com finalidades educativas. Recorrendo a uma metodologia de cariz qualitativo este estudo procura, pois, analisar um desses canais, centrando-se no caso da youtuber conhecida como Mathgurl, uma jovem portuguesa cujo canal dedicado a ensinar matemática de forma lúdica tem mais de três milhões de visualizações e é uma referência neste campo. As principais conclusões deste estudo remetem-nos para a ideia de que estes espaços não formais de aprendizagem não devem ser encarados como substitutos dos espaços formais de aprendizagem, pelo contrário, devem funcionar como espaços complementares com características próprias, online, abertos e em rede, e como “gatilhos” motivacionais e mobilizadores dos sujeitos para a aprendizagem da Matemática.
This paper seeks to compare and analyse the differences in the use of Twitter that, Partido Popular, as a traditional political party, and Ahora Madrid, as a new political party, make of the institutional channels for the public institutions that they administer. In addition, the present study analyses three different periods in the electoral process: the pre-campaign, campaign and post-campaign during the Spanish general elections of December 20th, 2015 in order to see if the election periods caused changes in their communications on Twitter. The sample consists of four cases divided into two groups for content analysis. On one hand, the Government's Twitter profile (@desdelamoncloa) and of its ruling party, Partido Popular (@ppopular), comprise the old political group, while the Madrid City Council (@Madrid) and its ruling party, Ahora Madrid (@AhoraMadrid), are integrated into the new political group. Additionally, word clouds provide a visual representation of the main terms used by each group. The study results show which group uses and better leverages Twitter's potential, in that Partido Popular and Moncloa have clearer differences between party and institutional channels, while Ahora Madrid and the Madrid City Council do not seem to be as clear about the difference between the two concepts and use the party channel as the city council channel. However, the results demonstrate that the new political profile leverages Twitter's potential more.
This paper seeks to compare and analyse the differences in the use of Twitter that, Partido Popular, as a traditional political party, and Ahora Madrid, as a new political party, make of the institutional channels for the public institutions that they administer. In addition, the present study analyses three different periods in the electoral process: the pre-campaign, campaign and post-campaign during the Spanish general elections of December 20th, 2015 in order to see if the election periods caused changes in their communications on Twitter. The sample consists of four cases divided into two groups for content analysis. On one hand, the Government’s Twitter profile (@desdelamoncloa) and of its ruling party, Partido Popular (@ppopular), comprise the old political group, while the Madrid City Council (@Madrid) and its ruling party, Ahora Madrid (@AhoraMadrid), are integrated into the new political group. Additionally, word clouds provide a visual representation of the main terms used by each group. The study results show which group uses and better leverages Twitter’s potential, in that Partido Popular and Moncloa have clearer differences between party and institutional channels, while Ahora Madrid and the Madrid City Council do not seem to be as clear about the difference between the two concepts and use the party channel as the city council channel. However, the results demonstrate that the new political profile leverages Twitter’s potential more.
La ciencia es uno de los campos de conocimiento más importantes de los que dispone el ser humano y tiene en la comunicación una de las principales bazas para divulgar sus descubrimientos, novedades, actualidad y sucesos destacables. Una comunicación científica que tiene en la imagen un soporte mediante el que mostrar conceptos de forma visual que a veces pueden ser difícilmente explicables únicamente mediante la palabra. Internet primero y las redes sociales después han cambiado los esquemas de la comunicación tal y como se conocían hasta su aparición. Facebook, Twitter o Instagram cuentan por cientos de millones sus usuarios, lo que ha sido valorado por las instituciones y organizaciones, incluidas las científicas. Estas redes sociales, en especial Twitter, se han erigido como un nuevo canal de comunicación más accesible que los medios tradicionales, con un mayor número de potenciales receptores, sobre todo para organizaciones sin los recursos necesarios para obtener presencia en dichos medios. El presente trabajo analiza el perfil en Twitter del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) para conocer la utilización que el organismo hace de las imágenes en los mensajes que envía en la red social. Según los resultados el CSIC hace un uso mayoritario de la imagen, sobre todo de ilustraciones o fotografías que muestran lo que se presenta en el texto del mensaje. Gracias a esta utilización de las imágenes, el CSIC aumenta sus impactos en la red social, con un mayor número de interacciones por parte de los usuarios.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.