Objectives: To evaluate nine rapid syphilis tests at eight geographically diverse laboratory sites for their performance and operational characteristics. Methods: Tests were compared ''head to head'' using locally assembled panels of 100 archived (50 positive and 50 negative) sera at each site using as reference standards the Treponema pallidum haemagglutination or the T pallidum particle agglutination test. In addition inter-site variation, result stability, test reproducibility and test operational characteristics were assessed. Results: All nine tests gave good performance relative to the reference standard with sensitivities ranging from 84.5-97.7% and specificities from 84.5-98%. Result stability was variable if result reading was delayed past the recommended period. All the tests were found to be easy to use, especially the lateral flow tests. Conclusions: All the tests evaluated have acceptable performance characteristics and could make an impact on the control of syphilis. Tests that can use whole blood and do not require refrigeration were selected for further evaluation in field settings.
An indirect immunofluorescent test for the rapid detection of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) virus in smears of nasal and ocular secretions from infected cattle, was compared with conventional virus isolation procedures using 200 swabs from 107 field outbreaks of suspected IBR. Virus was isolated from 38 per cent of the swabs and the indirect immunofluorescent test detected virus in 14.5 per cent of the positive swabs. Examination of samples from more than one animal increased the confirmation rates of infection during outbreaks to 39 per cent by virus isolation and 21.5 per cent by the immunofluorescent test. Ocular swabs were better than nasal swabs for confirming infection both by virus isolation and immunofluorescence, and agreement between the two tests increased with the number of samples collected during an outbreak.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.