Background: To study the efficacy of closed and open methods for creating pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by comparing the two in terms of their outcome and complication. Study Design: Single-centre, prospective, observational study. Materials and study: Purposive sampling method where the inclusion criteria were all patients with cholelithiasis who were advised and consented to laparoscopic cholecystectomy of age 18-70 years were included in the study group. Exclusion criteria include patients with a paraumbilical hernia, a history of upper abdominal surgery, uncontrolled systemic illness, and local skin infection. Sixty cases of cholelithiasis satisfying exclusion and inclusion criteria who underwent elective cholecystectomy during the study period were included. Thirty-one of these cases underwent the closed method, while in the remaining 29 patients open method was adopted. Cases in which pneumoperitoneum created by closed technique were grouped as group A and those by open technique as group B. Parameters comparing the safety and efficacy of the two methods were studied. The parameters were access time, gas leak, visceral injury, vascular injury, need for conversion, umbilical port site hematoma, umbilical port site infection, and hernia. Patients were assessed on the first postoperative day, the seventh postoperative day, and then two months after surgery. Some follow-ups were done telephonically. Results: Out of 60 patients, 31 underwent the closed method, while 29 underwent the open method. Minor complications like gas leak during the procedure was observed more in the open method. The mean access time in the open-method group was less than in the closed-method group. Other complications like visceral injury, vascular injury, need for conversion, umbilical port site hematoma, umbilical port site infection, and hernia were not observed in either group during the allocated follow-up period in the study. Conclusion:Open technique for pneumoperitoneum is as safe and effective as the closed technique.

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed in general surgery. Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty is a commonly practiced technique for open inguinal hernia repair. Out of many other complications postoperatively, chronic groin pain is one of the patients' most common postoperative complaints. There is no direct evidence to explain the cause of post-mesh hernioplasty pain. Only a few studies have been done to judge the effect of suture material used for mesh fixation on chronic groin pain. Aims and objectives: To compare the postoperative groin pain level in mesh hernioplasty using nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation at predetermined intervals using a visual analog scale (VAS) score. Methods: A prospective, single-center, non-randomized, observational study was conducted. All patients per inclusion and exclusion criteria of inguinal hernia planned for surgery were admitted electively on the day of surgery and were operated on in minor OT under local anesthesia for open mesh hernioplasty. The VAS score assessed the postoperative pain level. Results: This observational study was done to look for any difference in postoperative chronic groin pain after mesh fixation with either nonabsorbable, prolene sutures (PS) or absorbable vicryl sutures (VS). One hundred and ten patients fulfilling the department of general surgery inclusion criteria were admitted to the study. In our study, postoperatively, the incidence of chronic groin pain was assessed and followed up to six months. After six months, 25%of patients had pain. Of this 25%, the majority (70%) of patients had mild pain, 15% had moderate pain, and 15% had severe pain. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of mesh fixation by nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures. Conclusion: Inguinal hernia is one of the most typical conditions seen in general surgery clinics with male predominance. Definitive management of inguinal hernia is surgery. There is no difference in postoperative chronic groin pain with either type of suture material i.e., nonabsorbable or absorbable (prolene vs vicryl) sutures. To conclude, fixation material for mesh does not influence chronic inguinodynia. However, further studies are required for the same.

Background Cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures, and it is indicated for symptomatic gallstone disease. Symptoms of gallstone disease vary; many patients complain of the persistence of symptoms post-operatively. Hence, it is imperative to know the characteristics of symptoms that predict post-operative resolution. Methodology A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care centre. Patient demography and pre-operative symptoms were noted. Post-operative persistence or relief of symptoms was also documented. The occurrence of any new symptoms was noted. Data were collected at three and six months after surgery. Results Pain was the most common (85%) symptom. The mean frequency of pain was 2.45 per year (range 0-10). The mean duration of pain was 39.7 minutes (range 15-90 minutes). The right hypochondrium (39%) and the epigastric region (42%), along with 8% of patients who experienced pain in both places, were the most frequent locations of pain. The radiation of pain to the right-side scapula is present in 48% of patients. The pain persisted after one-week follow-up in 28 (34%) of patients, 26 (22%) at the end of one month, and 18 (21%) at the end of six months. Dyspepsia was unresolved in 25%, 20%, and 13% of individuals after one week, one month, and six months, respectively. Upper abdominal discomfort was still persistent in 29%, 26%, and 24% of study subjects at the time of follow-up periods, respectively. Similar persistence is found in symptoms of post-prandial fullness and nausea, where unresolved complaints of post-prandial fullness were present in 18%, 13%, and 10% of patients, respectively, and 26%, 14%, and 10% of patients complained of nausea. Conclusion The persistence of symptoms such as upper abdominal discomfort, dyspepsia, post-prandial fullness, and nausea is present, which gradually decreases in severity and presentation over the course of time after the surgical procedure. Some symptoms present after surgery, such as flatulence. Such persistent symptoms might lead to a decreased outcome in terms of patient satisfaction. Patients with atypical pain or dyspepsia need to be counselled pre-operatively regarding the poor resolution of such symptoms.