Purpose: Glaucoma affects different aspects of vision including visual field. This prospective observational study aims to collect details of driving license (DL) renewal procedure (in an urban metro in India) among patients with diagnosed glaucoma and the method of reporting of vision-related requirements during renewal. Methods: One-hundred patients with diagnosed glaucoma above 40 years, having valid DL (with at least one renewal cycle), were included. Patients with other ocular comorbidities were excluded. Driving Habits Questionnaire and a questionnaire about license renewal were administered. Driving eligibility was compared to international guidelines. Results: Study population included patients with 69% early, 29% moderate, and 2% advanced glaucoma. Sixteen percent of patients had stopped driving. Legal license renewal procedure was bypassed by 45%. Form-1 was not submitted by 43% and 49% did not submit Form-1A at the time of renewal. Only 7.01% mentioned about glaucoma in the self-declaration form. None were asked about their visual field during renewal. Among 61 patients who submitted a medical certificate, the undersigning doctor was an ophthalmologist in only six patients. Thirty percent patients with valid Indian DL would not have satisfied International College of Ophthalmologists guidelines. Driving difficulties were experienced by 44%, more so in advanced glaucoma ( F (1, 82) = 22.12, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Vision-related testing at the time of renewal of DL is inadequate in India. Chronic eye diseases such as glaucoma are commonly not self-declared or detected at pre-renewal testing. Clear-cut guidelines about visual requirements and implementation are required to prevent road traffic events because of vision-related errors.

No abstract

Précis: In India, older drivers with glaucoma show greater driving difficulty but are not involved in higher number of on-road accidents. To achieve balance between safety aspects and independence for drivers with glaucoma is important. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze driving habits of patients with glaucoma and to compare their driving behavior, driving difficulties, and accident rates with nonglaucoma controls. Patients: Patients with glaucoma aged older than 40 years were recruited. Subjects with best-corrected visual acuity ≤6/24 in the better-seeing eye and those having primary eye disorder other than glaucoma were excluded. Age-matched nonglaucoma controls were recruited. Subjects with clinically significant cataract and/or with best-corrected visual acuity ≤6/24 in both eyes were excluded. All cases and controls were legally licensed to drive. Materials and Methods: In this study, Driving Habits Questionnaire was used. Collected data were statistically analyzed using SAS, version 9.2 (GLM procedure), and IBM SPSS, version 22. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: All controls and 84% (n=84/100) of cases were current drivers. Among them, 16% (n=16/100) cases had stopped driving, of which 31.25% (n=5/16) had stopped because of self-reported ocular causes. Cases drove lesser number of days per week (P=0.001) and had more driving dependence on other drivers (44%, n=37/84) compared with controls. Glaucoma was significantly associated with driving difficulty in the rain, in rush-hour traffic, and at night. Comparing driving difficulty scores and visual field index within glaucoma group showed statistical significance [F(1,82)=22.12, P<0.001]. Composite scores of driving difficulty (P<0.001) and driving space (P=0.003) between the 2 groups showed strong statistical significance. Controls had higher number of self-reported accidents (P<0.001). Conclusions: Patients with glaucoma show greater driving difficulty, self-regulate their driving behavior, and restrict their driving. Older patients with glaucoma in India are not involved in higher rates of on-road crash risks compared with nonglaucoma drivers.

Results indicate a need for DV education for dental professionals to improve abuse recognition and enhance intervention.

Purpose: To evaluate the demographic details, clinical presentation, and surgical outcomes in patients presenting with strabismus following orbital wall fractures. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted over a 6-year period on 347 consecutive patients with strabismus who presented after orbital wall fractures. The patients were evaluated for their demographic data, clinical presentation, and profiles, management, complications, and outcomes of strabismus. Results: Strabismus following orbital wall fractures was noted in 347 patients: 87.03% were men (n = 302) and 12.97% were women (n = 45). Fracture of the orbital floor in isolation or in combination with other walls was more frequently noted in 72.3% of patients (n = 251). The resultant strabismus included paralytic, restrictive, or both etiologies. Exotropia was noted most frequently in 25.65% of patients (n = 89), followed by exotropia with hypotropia in 20.75% of patients (n = 72). Ten percent of patients with strabismus (n = 34), who were observed for at least 6 months after injury, underwent surgical correction for strabismus. Preoperative diplopia was observed in 79.41% of patients (n = 27) and persisted after strabismus surgery in 15% of patients (n = 6). A successful outcome regarding the postoperative angle of deviation of 10 prism diopters or less horizontal and/or 5 prism diopters or less of vertical deviation with elimination of diplopia was observed in 41.17% of patients. Conclusions: Strabismus following orbital wall fractures is complex and requires a tailored strategy. The current study found the orbital floor to be more frequently involved in orbital wall fractures. However, the resultant strabismus was a combination of paralytic and restrictive etiologies. [ J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2022;59(3):172–179.]