This is the first study to demonstrate that SFC given through the BAI produces comparable efficacy and safety endpoints as pMDI. Additionally, BAI was the preferred inhaler by patients compared to conventional pMDI.

BackgroundInvestigating the safety and efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapy with glycopyrronium (GB) 12.5 μg/formoterol fumarate (FF) 12 μg/fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 μg, compared to GB 50 μg co-administered with a fixed dose of FF 12 μg/FP 250 μg in subjects with COPD.MethodsA phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-control, parallel-group, noninferiority study conducted at 20 sites across India. COPD patients aged ≥40 to ≤75 years, with FEV1/FVC <0.70, using mono/dual therapy with ICS, LAMA, or LABA for ≥1 month, were included. Subjects were randomised 1:1 to GB/FF/FP or GB+FF/FP for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in trough FEV1 at the end of 12 weeks. The study is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI Reg No: CTRI/2019/01/017156).ResultsBetween March 23, 2019 and February 14, 2020, 396 subjects were enrolled, 198 patients each in the fixed-triple (GB/FF/FP) and open-triple (GB+FF/FP) groups. The difference in LSM changes in predose FEV1 from baseline at 12 weeks was noninferior between the groups (p<0.05). The LSM change from baseline in postdose FEV1 was comparable (p=0.38). Superiority test showed comparable efficacy (p =0.12) for the difference in mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 between the groups. Adverse events (mild or moderate) were recorded in 25.3% and 24.9% of subjects in the GB/FF/FP and GB+FF/FP groups.ConclusionsFixed triple therapy with GB/FF/FP provides comparable bronchodilation and lung function improvement like open triple therapy. It is safe and well-tolerated in symptomatic COPD patients with a history of exacerbations.

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of favipiravir, which is prescribed for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in India. Patients and Methods This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm postmarketing study conducted in India. Patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 received favipiravir (3600 mg [1800 mg orally twice daily] on the first day, followed by 800 mg orally twice daily, up to a maximum of 14 days) as a part of their treatment. The primary endpoints were to evaluate the safety of favipiravir by assessing the number of adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related AEs. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the efficacy of favipiravir by assessing time to clinical cure, rate of clinical cure, time to pyrexia resolution, rate of oxygen requirement, and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 1083 patients were enrolled in this study from December 2020 to June 2021. Adverse events were reported in 129 patients (11.9%), 116 (10.7%) of whom had mild AEs. Dose modification or withdrawal of favipiravir treatment was reported in four patients (0.37%). The median time to clinical cure and pyrexia resolution was 7 and 4 days, respectively. A total of 1036 patients (95.8%) exhibited clinical cure by day 14. Oxygen support was required by 15 patients (1.4%). One death was reported, which was unrelated to favipiravir. Conclusion In the real-world setting, favipiravir was well-tolerated, and no new safety signals were detected.

No abstract

No abstract