Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) updated the staging system for penile squamous cell carcinoma. According to it, unlike its previous version, the involvement of urethra does not upstage the tumor; however, the involvement of corpora cavernosa (CC) does. The tumors involving CC are now staged pT3, whereas those involving corpora spongiosa (CS) are staged pT2, irrespective of the involvement of the urethra. In the current study, we sought to validate these recent modifications and in-process also attempted to improvise upon it. The histopathology slides were reviewed in 142 cases of penile squamous cell carcinoma. The histopathologic variables noted were tumor grade, anatomic level of invasion (CC/CS), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PNI). Metastases to the lymph nodes were confirmed. Tumors were staged pT2/pT3 according to AJCC 8th edition and this staging system was further improvised by incorporating histopathologic variables similar to pT1 tumors in AJCC 8th edition. Accordingly, pT2 tumors invaded CS/CC without LVI or PNI and were not grade 3, whereas pT3 tumors invaded CS/CC, showed LVI and/or PNI, or were grade 3. Both the staging models were then correlated with nodal metastasis and disease-free survival. The new staging model (P=0.001) and not the AJCC pT2/pT3 stages (P=0.2) showed a statistically significant correlation with nodal metastasis. Similarly, only the proposed model significantly impacted disease-free survival (P=0.011). To conclude, we were unable to validate the prognostic difference between the pT2/pT3 stages according to AJCC 8th edition. The staging system can be improvised by incorporating histopathologic variables similar to pT1 tumors.

Purpose: We evaluated the prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer detection on systematic biopsy (SB), target biopsy (TB) alone and combined SB and TB in men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data SystemÔ (PI-RADSÔ) 5 lesion. Materials and Methods: From a prospectively maintained prostate biopsy database, we identified consecutive patients with PI-RADS 5 lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. The patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by transrectal TB of PI-RADS 5 lesion and 12-core SB. The prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (Grade Group, GG 2) detection on SB, TB and SBDTB were determined for all men and accordingly to prostate specific antigen density. Statistic significant was set a p <0.05. Results: Overall, 112 patients met inclusion criteria. The detection rate of prostate cancer for SB, TB and SBDTB was 89%, 93% and 95%, respectively, and for clinically significant prostate cancer it was 72%, 81% and 85%, respectively. SB added 2% prostate cancer and 4% clinically significant prostate cancer detection to TB. A total of 78 patients had prostate specific antigen density >0.15 ng/ml 2 , and the detection rate of PCa for SB, TB and SBDTB was 92%, 97% and 97%, respectively, and for clinically significant prostate cancer it was 79%, 91% and 95%, respectively. In this population, if SB was omitted, 0 prostate cancer and only 4% (3) of clinically significant prostate cancer would be missed. The clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate improved with increased prostate specific antigen density for SB (p[0.01), TB (p <0.0001) and combined SBDTB (p[0.002).

Background: Frozen section (FS) diagnosis is one of the promising applications of digital pathology (DP). However, the implementation of an appropriate and economically viable DP solution for FS in routine practice is challenging. The objective of this study was to establish the non-inferiority of whole-slide imaging (WSI) versus optical microscopy (OM) for FS diagnosis using a low cost and portable DP system. Materials and Methods: A validation study to investigate the technical performance and diagnostic accuracy of WSI versus OM for FS diagnosis was performed using 60 FS cases[120 slides i.e, 60 hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) and 60 toluidine blue (TOLB)]. The diagnostic concordance, inter- and intra-observer agreement for FS diagnosis by WSI versus OM were recorded. Results: The first time successful scanning rate was 89.1% (107/120). Mean scanning time per slide for H and E and TOLB slide was 1:47 min (range; 0:22–3: 21 min) and 1:46 min (range; 0:21–3: 20 min), respectively. Mean storage space per slide for H and E and TOLB slide was 0.83 GB (range: 0.12–1.73 GB) and 0.71 GB (range: 0.11–1.66 GB), respectively. Considering major discrepancies, the overall diagnostic concordance for OM and WSI, when compared with the reference standard, was 95.42% and 95.83%, respectively. There was almost perfect intra as well as inter-observer agreement ( k ≥ 0.8) among 4 pathologists between WSI and OM for FS diagnosis. Mean turnaround time (TAT) of 14:58 min was observed using WSI for FS diagnosis, which was within the College of American Pathologists recommended range for FS reporting. The image quality was average to best quality in most of the cases. Conclusion: WSI was noninferior to OM for FS diagnosis across various specimen types. This portable WSI system can be safely adopted for routine FS diagnosis and provides an economically viable alternative to high-end scanners.