Background Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody has proven to be effective in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients positive for programmed cell death-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1). However, there are currently no prospective studies evaluating PD-L1 expression for small biopsy samples. Methods To prospectively investigate the reliability of small samples for NSCLC, we included patients who underwent diagnostic biopsy by flexible bronchoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and ultra-sonography (US) guided core-needle to determine the PD-L1 expression status. In pathologically confirmed NSCLC, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using companion diagnostic PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. We evaluated: 1) tumor cell count and sample size, 2) tumor proportion score (TPS): <1, 1–49%, 50%≦, and 3) the concordance rate of TPS by biopsy and surgical samples. Results Of the 153 cases of PD-L1 expression, 110 were assessed using endobronchial ultrasonography guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) (thin bronchoscopy 84 cases; normal bronchoscopy 26 cases), 23 were endobronchial ultrasonography guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), and 20 cases of CT or US-guided core-needle biopsy. Tumor cell count and sample size were significantly larger for normal bronchoscopy than thin bronchoscopy or EBUS-TBNA samples. Moreover, tumor cell counts for each subsequent biopsy decreased. In all cases, TPS distribution (undiagnosed, <1%, 1–49, 50%≦) was 2.6, 34.6, 31.4, 31.4%, respectively. TPS positive cases using thin bronchoscope was 55.9%, normal bronchoscope was 73.1% and EBUS-TBNA was 78.3%. In early stage adenocarcinoma, TPS was lower compared with advanced stages. Conversely, in squamous cell carcinoma, the rates of TPS were similar regardless of stage. The concordance rate of TPS by biopsy and surgical materials was 86.7%. Conclusion Utilizing smaller samples for evaluation, the frequency of TPS was comparable to past clinical trials using larger samples. The differences in TPS were influenced by diagnostic tools, cancer histologic types and staging. The concordance of TPS between EBUS-TBB samples and surgical materials was high. Trial registration This study was performed at the Department of Respiratory Medicine at St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, with ethics approval (#3590) and registered as a clinical trial ( UMIN000027030 ). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5773-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
A 51-year-old male patient was receiving treatment for Mycobacterium abscessus infection for approximately 10 years. However, as his condition gradually progressed to type II respiratory insufficiency, he was referred to our hospital, which was near his home. Computed tomography on his first visit revealed an abscess in the right lower lobe. Because respiratory insufficiency was evident, he was admitted the same day. We began treatment with meropenem, amikacin, and clarithromycin, but his symptoms did not improve. In accordance with the 2007 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America statement, we administered linezolid, which resulted in gradual improvement in his physical status and imaging findings.
An 83-years-old woman diagnosed with advanced Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma was administered afatinib as a first-line treatment. On Day 17, the patient presented with grade 3 diarrhea and a blood test analysis showed an increased inflammatory response. Afatinib treatment was discontinued on the same day. On Day 26, the patient displayed blepharedema and multiple irregular erythema covering her entire body. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) was suspected, and the systemic administration of 30 mg/day prednisolone was administered. The symptoms subsided thereafter. A blood test analysis 3 weeks after onset revealed a reactivation of Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) and a diagnosis of DIHS due to afatinib therapy was confirmed.
A 44-year-old man presented at our hospital to be evaluated for persistent fever and dyspnea. A chest computed tomography (CT) scan showed diffuse ground glass shadows and a left hilar tumor shadow. Upon further examination, he was found to have leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin levels. He was diagnosed with both squamous cell lung carcinoma by a transbronchial lung biopsy and hemophagocytic syndrome by a bone marrow biopsy. After receiving treatment with dexamethasone and etoposide, the blood test abnormalities and performance status improved. Chemotherapy for lung cancer was initiated. He had a partial response after first-line chemotherapy and thereafter underwent left upper sleeve lobectomy.
range 0-300). Association between c-MET H-score and overall survival (OS) as well as progression-free survival (PFS) was explored. Result: c-MET H-score over 20 had a significant protective impact on OS in the multivariate analysis in the whole study population, both as continuous variable (p¼0.014), as well as dichotomous variable with HR¼0.79 (95%CI: 0.64-0.97, p-value ¼ 0.022). The prognostic effect of c-MET H-score over 20 was stronger in patients who received adjuvant treatment with a HR¼0.61 (95% CI: 0.40-0.93, p-value¼0.022). In the subgroup of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with stage IIA-IIIB disease, the prognostic impact of c-MET was significant even in the univariate analysis (HR¼0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.83, p-value¼0.002). Conclusion: c-MET H score >20 is a positive prognostic biomarker for OS in early stage NSCLC. This benefit seems to be strongly correlated to adjuvant chemotherapy, therefore rendering c-MET H-score >20 a possible predictive biomarker for platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.