The conduction mechanism in heavily Al-doped or heavily Al-and N-codoped p-type 4H-SiC epilayers was investigated. In both the singly-doped and codoped samples with an Al concentration (CAl) between 4x1019 and 2x1020 cm-3, band and nearest-neighbor hopping (NNH) conductions appeared in high and low temperature ranges, respectively. The codoping of N donors makes the NNH conduction dominant at temperatures higher than in the singly-doped samples. In both the singly-doped and codoped samples with CAl between 1x1019 and 4x1019 cm-3, an unexpected conduction appeared between the regions of the band and NNH conductions.
To reduce the resistivity of heavily Al-doped 4H-SiC epilayers, the conduction mechanisms were investigated for Al concentrations (CAl) between 2.4 × 1019 and 4.7 × 1020 cm−3 and measurement temperatures (T) between 20 and 600 K. The results elucidated the relationship between the conduction mechanisms and the values of T and CAl. For the epilayers with CAl ∼ 3 × 1019 cm−3, an unexpected additional conduction mechanism was observed between the band and nearest-neighbor-hopping conduction regions, for which two plausible conduction models are proposed. To reduce the resistivity of epilayers with CAl > 2 × 1020 cm−3, it is essential to fabricate samples with low lattice distortion.
We investigate the transition of the conduction mechanism from band and nearest-neighbor hopping (NNH) conduction to variable-range hopping (VRH) conduction in heavily Al-doped 4H-SiC epilayers with increasing Al concentration (C
Al). In a sample with C
Al of 1.8 × 1020 cm−3, the dominant conduction mechanisms at high and low temperatures were band and VRH conduction, respectively, whereas in samples with lower C
Al values they were band and NNH conduction, respectively, and in samples with higher C
Al values VRH conduction was dominant over the entire range of measurement temperatures examined (20–600 K).
The temperature dependencies of the resistivity and Hall coefficient for heavily Al-doped 4H-SiC epilayers with Al concentration (CAl) higher than 2×1019 cm-3 were investigated. The signs of measured Hall coefficients (RH) change from positive to negative at low temperatures. For the epilayers with CAl < 3×1019 cm-3 the sign inversion occurred in the hopping conduction region, which was reported to be explicable using the model for amorphous semiconductors. For the epilayers with CAl > 3×1019 cm-3, on the other hand, the sign inversion occurred in the band conduction region, which is a striking feature, because the movement of free holes in the valence band should make RH positive. The sign-inversion temperature increased with increasing CAl, while the dominant-conduction-mechanism-change temperature was almost independent of CAl.
We have observed negative Hall coefficients [R
H(T)] in a nearest-neighbor hopping (NNH) conduction region in epilayers of heavily Al-doped or Al–N co-doped p-type 4H-SiC grown on n-type 4H-SiC substrates by CVD or in wafers of heavily Al–N co-doped p-type 4H-SiC fabricated by solution growth. We propose a simple physical model to explain the sign of R
H(T) in NNH conduction. According to this model, R
H(T) becomes positive when the Fermi level (E
F) is higher than the Al acceptor level (E
Al), that is, the Fermi–Dirac distribution function f(E
Al) is greater than 0.5, whereas R
H(T) becomes negative when E
F is lower than E
Al, which occurs at low temperatures. Because the dominant conduction mechanisms in heavily Al-doped or Al–N co-doped p-type 4H-SiC with Al concentrations on the order of 1019 cm−3 are band and NNH conduction at high and low temperatures, respectively, the proposed model can explain why R
H(T) becomes negative at low temperatures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.