No abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL; "QOL" hereafter) was evaluated in Japanese osteoporotic patients using three questionnaires; the SF-36 (MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; generic, profile-type), the EQ-5D (Euro Qol-5 Dimensions; generic, preference-based), and the JOQOL (Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life 1999; disease-targeted). The eight subscales and two summary scores of the SF-36 were impaired in these patients even after correction for age and sex. The scores on the EQ-5D and JOQOL correlated well with the subscales of the SF-36 that represent the physical aspects of physical function and bodily pain, which suggests that physical aspects are important determinants of overall QOL status in osteoporotic patients. Although the QOL scores did not correlate with bone mineral density, they were markedly influenced by the presence of vertebral fractures. In particular, the presence of two or more vertebral fractures greatly decreased the QOL scores. We then evaluated the QOL scores before and after treatment. The patients were either given calcium supplementation alone or calcium plus once-weekly elcatonin (Elcitonin, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) injection. Elcatonin treatment markedly improved diverse aspects of the QOL, whereas calcium alone did not. The current data suggest that osteoporosis, especially in the presence of vertebral fracture, is associated with compromised QOL, and therapeutic intervention for osteoporosis should be evaluated in terms of QOL, as well as in terms of increases in bone mineral density and fracture prevention.

Summary Background The purpose of the current study was to clarify the relationship between clinical features of dysphagia after esophagectomy and preoperative sarcopenia. Methods A total of 187 cases were included in the current study. The psoas cross-sectional area on pre-treatment computed tomography was measured in thoracic esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative resection. The psoas muscle index (PMI) cut-off levels for sarcopenia were 6.36 cm2/m2 for men and 3.92 cm2/m2 for women. Swallowing function was evaluated using videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) at postoperative days 7–15, and classified according to the food intake level scale (FILS). Perioperative swallowing rehabilitation was performed in all cases. Results In the 187 included patients, the median PMI was 5.42 cm2/m2 for men and 3.43 cm2/m2 for women, and 133 cases (71%) met the sarcopenia criteria. The FILS <4 (no oral intake) was 15% in the non-sarcopenia group, and 38% in the sarcopenia group (P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, including pneumonia and re-admission due to pneumonia, between the two groups. Preoperative sarcopenia and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were be independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Conclusions Sarcopenic patients with esophageal cancer develop postoperative dysphagia more often than non-sarcopenic patients. Prehabilitation and nutritional support for patients with preoperative sarcopenia could play an important role to mitigate postoperative dysphagia.