We suggest that during TKA, the use of tourniquet induces local release of a large amount of NE from neutrophils, inducing the development of DVT and/or PTE and their exacerbation.

SUMMARY:To examine whether synovial cell proliferation is due to angiogenesis, we studied the relationship between the inhibition of synovial cell proliferation and an angiogenesis inhibitor, TNP-470, in human synovial tissues. Human synovial tissues were implanted into the back of SCID mice (SCID-HuAg mice). Sixteen mice were divided into two groups of eight mice each: the untreated group (vehicle group) and the TNP-470-treated group that received a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight by subcutaneous injection. The number of blood vessels and synovial lining cells clearly increased in the vehicle group, but the number of synovial lining cells clearly decreased and the blood vessels were hardly detected in the TNP-470 group. Immunohistochemically, cells that stained positively for the anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) mAb were abundant in synovial lining cells and endothelial cells in synovial tissues. Cells that stained positively for the anti-CD34 polyclonal antibody were abundant in the endothelial cells in the vehicle group, but these positively stained cells were hardly detected in the TNP-470 group. The PCNA positivity ratio in the vehicle group was 0.64 Ϯ 0.019, whereas that in the TNP-470 group was 0.199 Ϯ 0.007. The numbers of cells that stained positively for anti-CD34 polyclonal antibody were 242 Ϯ 13.4 in the vehicle group and 153 Ϯ 6.73 in the TNP-470 group per 10 microscopic fields. Cells that stained positively for anti-mouse CD31 mAb were mainly localized in the synovial lining, but invaded the subsynovial lining layer in human synovial tissues. On the other hand, cells that stained positively for anti-human CD31 mAb were mainly localized in the subsynovial lining layer. We found that endothelial cell proliferation is dependent on angiogenesis based on the result that angiogenesis and synovial cell proliferation were inhibited by treatment with TNP-470. (Lab Invest 2002, 82:981-988).

The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist etanercept is an antirheumatic agent which was approved by Japanese regulatory authorities in January 2005. In Japan, the cost-effectiveness of this therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not previously been evaluated. This study models the cost-utility of etanercept in comparison with standard therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) among adult Japanese RA patients who have failed a previous course of the DMARD bucillamine. A Markov model with 6-month cycles was constructed to compare two therapeutic strategies: etanercept versus standard therapy. For each cycle, one of three options was possible: a patient could (i) remain on current therapy if American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% clinical improvement (ACR20) were achieved, (ii) switch to another drug in the therapeutic pathway if ACR20 was not achieved or if side effects severe enough to cause treatment discontinuation occurred, or (iii) they could die. The therapeutic pathway for the etanercept strategy was etanercept, methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), combination therapy (MTX + SSZ) and, finally, no DMARD. The pathway for standard therapy was identical except the initial therapy was MTX (etanercept was excluded). Results from clinical trials in U.S. and European patient populations were used to derive model probabilities for disease progression, response to drug therapy, and relationships between ACR20 response and functional improvement as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index. An equation was developed to predict utility from HAQ scores of Japanese patients. Costs for drugs and medical services in Japan were obtained for April 2003. Analysis was conducted from a societal perspective, including lost productivity costs due to RA disability and premature mortality. Costs were discounted at 6% annually, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 1.5% annually. Model parameters were varied by 20% above and below base-case values in sensitivity analyses. Compared to standard therapy, the etanercept strategy was yen6.39 million more costly per patient but yielded an additional 2.56 QALYs. The incremental cost-utility ratio was yen 2.50 million/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed that cost-utility was most strongly influenced by the acquisition cost of etanercept and the percentage of etanercept recipients who achieved ACR20. Using commonly applied thresholds for acceptable cost-effectiveness in the United States ($50 000 = yen 5.5 million/QALY) and the United Kingdom (pound 30 000 = yen 5.7 million/QALY), etanercept therapy in Japan can be considered cost-effective. Cost-utility ratios did not exceed these thresholds in any sensitivity analysis. Further analyses should be conducted once clinical and epidemiologic data for Japanese patients become available.

We report herein a retrospective study of 25 cases of ankle arthrodesis performed in 23 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using an intramedullary nail with fins, developed in 1994. Surgical treatment, postoperative management, and clinical evaluation are described. Clinical evaluation, at an average follow-up period of 7 years 1 month, was based on foot disease scores from the Japanese Orthopedic Association; we compared these scores pre- and postoperatively, and during follow-up. These parameters showed a significant difference between preoperation and the follow-up period. However, instability only significantly improved when compared between pre- and postoperation. Arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail with fins was effective for the treatment of severe deformity of the hind foot. Nonunion was not observed and no remarkable changes of the Chopart joint were recognized between preoperation and the follow-up period. In our series, delayed wound healing was recognized in 6 of 25 joints. However, infection or neuropathy and other complications were not found. Arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail with fins is a viable treatment option for severe deformity of the hind foot in RA patients, because nonunion was not recognized and the clinical results over an average 7-year follow-up period were good or satisfactory.

The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist etanercept is an antirheumatic agent which was approved by Japanese regulatory authorities in January 2005. In Japan, the cost-effectiveness of this therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not previously been evaluated. This study models the cost-utility of etanercept in comparison with standard therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) among adult Japanese RA patients who have failed a previous course of the DMARD bucillamine. A Markov model with 6-month cycles was constructed to compare two therapeutic strategies: etanercept versus standard therapy. For each cycle, one of three options was possible: a patient could (i) remain on current therapy if American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% clinical improvement (ACR20) were achieved, (ii) switch to another drug in the therapeutic pathway if ACR20 was not achieved or if side effects severe enough to cause treatment discontinuation occurred, or (iii) they could die. The therapeutic pathway for the etanercept strategy was etanercept, methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), combination therapy (MTX + SSZ) and, finally, no DMARD. The pathway for standard therapy was identical except the initial therapy was MTX (etanercept was excluded). Results from clinical trials in U.S. and European patient populations were used to derive model probabilities for disease progression, response to drug therapy, and relationships between ACR20 response and functional improvement as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index. An equation was developed to predict utility from HAQ scores of Japanese patients. Costs for drugs and medical services in Japan were obtained for April 2003. Analysis was conducted from a societal perspective, including lost productivity costs due to RA disability and premature mortality. Costs were discounted at 6% annually, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 1.5% annually. Model parameters were varied by 20% above and below base-case values in sensitivity analyses. Compared to standard therapy, the etanercept strategy was yen6.39 million more costly per patient but yielded an additional 2.56 QALYs. The incremental cost-utility ratio was yen 2.50 million/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed that cost-utility was most strongly influenced by the acquisition cost of etanercept and the percentage of etanercept recipients who achieved ACR20. Using commonly applied thresholds for acceptable cost-effectiveness in the United States ($50 000 = yen 5.5 million/QALY) and the United Kingdom (pound 30 000 = yen 5.7 million/QALY), etanercept therapy in Japan can be considered cost-effective. Cost-utility ratios did not exceed these thresholds in any sensitivity analysis. Further analyses should be conducted once clinical and epidemiologic data for Japanese patients become available.