Background Implementation of the ruling on the Inpatient Prospective Payment System by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid has challenged nurses to focus on the prevention of pressure ulcers. Despite years of research, pressure ulcers are still one of the most common complications experienced by patients in health care facilities. Objective To examine the relationship between patients' characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, history of diabetes, and Braden Scale score at admission) and care characteristics (total operating room time, multiple surgeries, and vasopressor use) and the development of pressure ulcers. Methods In a cohort study, data from the electronic medical records of 3225 surgical patients admitted to a Midwest hospital, from November 2008 to August 2009 were analyzed statistically to determine predictors of pressure ulcers. Results A total of 12% of patients (n = 383) had at least 1 pressure ulcer develop during their hospitalization. According to logistic regression analysis, scores on the Braden Scale at admission (P < .001), low body mass index (P < .001), number of vasopressors (P = .03), multiple surgeries during the admission (P < .001), total surgery time (P < .001), and risk for mortality (P < .001) were significant predictors of pressure ulcers. Conclusion Scores on the Braden Scale at admission can be used to identify patients at increased risk for pressure ulcers. For other high-risk factors, such as low body mass index and long operative procedures, appropriate clinical interventions to manage these conditions can help prevent pressure ulcers.

Surgical site infections are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality and add significantly to the cost of care. One component of the national Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) program is to ensure timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics, a key factor to reduce postoperative infection. Our anesthesia department decided to assume the responsibility for timing and administration of antibiotic prophylaxis and we initiated a multitiered approach to remind the anesthesiologist to administer the prophylactic antibiotics. We used our anesthesia clinical information system to implement practice guidelines for timely antibiotic administration and to generate reports from the database to provide specific feedback to individual care providers with the goal of ensuring that patients receive antibiotic prophylaxis within 1 h of incision. Before the initiation of this project, 69% of eligible patients received antibiotics within 60 min of the incision. After the program began, there was a steady increase in compliance to 92% 1 yr later. Provider-specific feedback increases compliance with practice guidelines related to timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics. Anesthesia information systems hold promise for implementing and monitoring new practice guidelines and the anesthesiologist may play a key role in influencing surgical outcomes by ensuring appropriate therapy that may not be directly related to anesthesia care.

Approximately 2,700 patients are harmed by wrong-site surgery each year. The World Health Organization created the surgical safety checklist to reduce the incidence of wrong-site surgery. A project team conducted a narrative review of the literature to determine the effectiveness of the surgical safety checklist in correcting and preventing errors in the OR. Team members used Swiss cheese model of error by Reason to analyze the findings. Analysis of results indicated the effectiveness of the surgical checklist in reducing the incidence of wrong-site surgeries and other medical errors; however, checklists alone will not prevent all errors. Successful implementation requires perioperative stakeholders to understand the nature of errors, recognize the complex dynamic between systems and individuals, and create a just culture that encourages a shared vision of patient safety.