This study develops and estimates a dynamic panel model to examine the simultaneous relationship between capital regulations and bank risk-taking in the Bangladeshi banking sector. Furthermore, the study investigates the impact of capital regulations and bank risk-taking on performance. The study investigates on 30 commercial banks of Bangladesh over the period 2002-2016 using two-step system GMM estimator. The study also uses two-stage least squares regression to check the robustness of the findings. The empirical evidence is found showing the significant negative association between capital regulations and risk-taking simultaneously. The study also finds evidence that there is a significant positive impact of capital regulations on bank performance. In contrast, the findings show that bank risk-taking has significant negative impacts on performance. The study expects that the results of this study will add value to the existing literature and will be significant for the future researcher and policymaker to decide in this regard. Contribution/ Originality:This study contributes to the existing literature by investigating the simultaneous relationship between capital regulations and bank risk-taking on the emerging economy like Bangladesh. The study further examines the impact of capital regulations and bank risk-taking on performance. The study empirically uses dynamic panel model with two-step system GMM estimator which provides consistent results by overcoming the issue of endogeneity, serial correlation, and heteroscedasticity.

Purpose This paper aims to explore the effects of bank diversification (i.e. diversification of income and diversification of assets) on Bangladeshi banks’ profitability. Design/methodology/approach Using a dynamic panel data model with system generalized methods of moments, the authors examine an unbalanced panel data from 32 banks spanning 318 bank-year observations from 2007 to 2016. Findings The findings indicate a significant positive association of income diversification and asset diversification on bank profitability. Therefore, the results show that banks can generate profit from diversification of income and diversification of assets. Originality/value One of the rare attempts to investigate the relationship between diversification and profitability in Bangladesh’s banking sector is this report. The authors anticipate the results to have major consequences for Bangladeshi bank regulators and other related economies.

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how the corporate attributes, namely, company size, age, leverage, profitability and ownership concentration, are associated with corporate social disclosures (CSD). The paper further examines whether there are any moderating effects on the association because of different proxies of corporate attributes. Design/methodology/approach The study uses 35 articles published between 1996 and 2016 for finding out the integrated results of the previous studies. The study uses the meta-analysis technique developed by Hunter et al. (1982) and Hunter and Schmidt (1990). Findings The findings of the overall meta-analysis show that company size and ownership concentration are significantly and positively associated with CSD, while age, profitability and leverage indicate an insignificant positive association. Also, the different proxies of explanatory variables moderate the association between corporate attributes and CSD. Originality/value This is a unique study that determines the association between corporate attributes and CSD by using meta-analysis. Therefore, it is expected that this investigation solves the inconclusive and mixed results of the prior studies and assists future researchers to develop a theory in that context.

This study investigates the employees' job satisfaction of general insurance companies in Bangladesh. A questionnaire was utilized to collect primary data from both public and private general insurance companies. The first part of the questionnaire comprises of the demographic profile of the respondents and the last part indicates the key measuring variables on a Likert scale ranging from 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree) of job satisfaction. The total number of respondents for this study was 385. 74.80 percent of the total respondents have taken from the private general insurance companies, and the remaining percentage from the public general insurance company. 70 percent of the total respondents were male respondents, and 30 percent of the total respondents were female respondents. Factor analysis and correlation matrix have been conducted to analyze the collected data. This study postulates that employees of general insurance companies have positive as well as negative feelings. Three factors reflect positive feelings toward their jobs. These factors are pay and promotional potential, the well-organized chain of command and general working condition. On the other hand, two factors are responsible for negative feelings. These factors are poor team spirit and poor job security. This paper also advocates some recommendations to maximize the positive feelings and to minimize the negative. The proper higher authority should ensure participating decision method to take any decision, the fair delegation, and direct relationship with sub-ordinates to enhance the team spirit for minimizing the dissatisfaction of the employees and should ensure the job security of the employees to get their best effort to achieve the organizational goal.

The purpose of this paper is to empirically analyze the financial statement of two selected banks (One bank from the public sector and another one from the private) in Bangladesh during 2010-14. This study highlights ranking of two banks for their performance on CAMEL (Capital Adequacy; Asset Quality; Management Quality; Earnings Ability; and Liquidity) ratios. During the year Empirical results suggest that 2010-2014 NCCBL has scored better position of all the ratios except EPS, liquid assets to total assets and liquid assets to total deposits compared to JBL. By considering all of the parameters of CAMEL, NCCBL is the highest position assessed by the CAMEL Model because of its performance on the CAMEL ratios compared to JBL. JBL is lower position compared to NCCBL under the study because of its poor performance on the CAMEL ratios. The ultimate findings of the study indicate that JBL should improve the weaknesses of the CAMEL which ultimately improve the bank’s overall performance. The findings of the paper will enable the practitioners and analysts to understand financial statement analysis in a depth manner.