Women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have bothersome complaints that significantly affect their quality of life. While native tissue repair is associated with high recurrence rates, polypropylene knitted implants have caused specific implant-related adverse events that have detrimental, often irreversible, effects. We hypothesize that surgical outcome can be improved with a tissue-engineered solution using an absorbable implant that mimics the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) structure, releases estrogen, and activates collagen metabolism by fibroblasts as the main regulators of wound healing. To this aim, we produced electrospun poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffolds and biofunctionalized them with estradiol (E2). The cell–implant interactions relevant for POP repair were assessed by seeding primary POP vaginal fibroblasts isolated from patients on electrospun P4HB scaffolds with 1%, 2%, or 5% E2 and without E2. To test our hypothesis on whether ECM mimicking structures should improve regeneration, electrospun P4HB was compared to knitted P4HB implants. We evaluated vaginal fibroblast proliferation, ECM deposition, and metabolism by quantification of collagen, elastin, and matrix metalloproteinases and by gene expression analysis for 28 days. We established effective E2 drug loading with a steady release over time. Significantly higher cell proliferation, collagen-, and elastin deposition were observed on electrospun P4HB scaffolds as compared to knitted P4HB. For this study, physical properties of the scaffolds were more determinant on the cell response than the release of E2. These results indicate that making these electrospun P4HB scaffolds E2-releasing appears to be technically feasible. In addition, electrospun P4HB scaffolds promote the cellular response of vaginal fibroblasts and further studies are merited to assess if their use results in improved surgical outcomes in case of POP repair.

No abstract

Aim Before the introduction of new biomaterials for prolapse surgery, animal studies on the host response are required. Unfortunately, large variation in study design hampers obtaining an overview of the safety and efficacy, and translation to clinical practice. Our aim is to systematically review the literature on all outcome measures describing the host response in animal studies assessing the biocompatibility of urogynecologic surgical mesh implants for prolapse surgery. Furthermore, by meta‐analysis, we aim to assess the effect of implantation and compare this to control animals receiving sham surgery or native tissue repair. Methods We performed a systematic search from inception to August 2020. Since this is an explorative study we included original, controlled, and noncontrolled animal studies describing any host response to the implant. Quantitative outcome measures reported ≥10 times in ≥2 articles were eligible for meta‐analysis. Results Fifty articles were included in the qualitative synthesis and 36 articles were eligible for meta‐analysis. In total, 154 outcome measures were defined and classified into (1) histomorphology, (2) biomechanics and, (3) macroscopic morphology. Animals with vaginal implants demonstrated significantly increased M1 and M2 macrophages, MMP‐2, neovascularization, TNF‐α, and stiffness, and lower vaginal contractility compared to control animals. Conclusion The host response significantly differs in animals after vaginal mesh implantation compared to control animals, both pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory. However, we observed a paucity in the uniformity of reported outcomes. For future animal studies, we propose the development of a core outcome set, which ideally predicts the host response in women.