Few large, multi-ethnic studies have examined the clinical and serologic differences between familial and sporadic SLE patients. Understanding these similarities and differences is critical for interpreting genetic studies and developing therapeutic strategies. We compiled information on 1915 patients with SLE in a large multi-racial cohort, including general demographics, pedigree structure and the specific American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria met. One patient was randomly selected from each multiplex family for analysis, yielding 554 European-Americans (EA), 373 African-Americans (AA), 193 Hispanics (HI) and 237 patients of other of mixed races. When comparing familial and sporadic patients stratified by race, lupus erythematosus (LE) cells and arthritis were increased in white familial cases (P = 5.5 x 10(-6) and P = 0.028, respectively), but no other significant differences between familial and sporadic patients were found. We found that there were profound differences in clinical profiles between races. For example, photosensitivity and malar rash were decreased in AA (P = 1.3 x 10(-13) and 1.4 x 10(-7), respectively), whereas discoid rash was increased in AA (P = 5.5x10(-6)). EA had significantly less renal disease (P = 5.4x10(-13)), proteinuria (P = 4 x 10(-12)) and anti-Sm (P = 1.7 x 10(-12)) than AA or HI. We, therefore, conclude that familial and sporadic onset patients may be treated similarly with respect to clinical and genetic studies.

Genetic complete deficiency of the early complement components such as C1, C2 and C4 commonly results in a monogenetic form of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, previous studies have examined groups of complete complement deficient subjects for SLE, while a familial SLE cohort has not been studied for deficiencies of complement. Thus, we undertook the present study to determine the frequency of hereditary complete complement deficiencies among families with two or more SLE patients. All SLE patients from 544 such families had CH50 determined. Medical records were examined for past CH50 values. There were 66 individuals in whom all available CH50 values were zero. All but four of these had an SLE-affected relative with a non-zero CH50; thus, these families did not have monogenic complement deficient related SLE. The four remaining SLEaffected subjects were in fact two sets of siblings in which 3 of the 4 SLE patients had onset of disease at <18 years of age. Both patients in one of these families had been determined to have C4 deficiency, while the other family had no clinical diagnosis of complement deficiency. In this second family, one of the SLE patients had had normal C4 and C3 values, indicating that either C1q or C2 deficiency was possible. Thus, only 2 of 544 SLE families had definite or possible complement deficiency; however, 1 of 7 families in which all SLE patients had pediatric onset and 2 of 85 families with at least 1 pediatric-onset SLE patent had complete complement deficiency. SLE is found commonly among families with hereditary complement deficiency but the reverse is not true. Complete complement deficiency is rare among families with two or more SLE patients, but is concentrated among families with onset of SLE prior to age 18.

The occurrence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in several members of a family has spurred intense efforts to identify susceptibility genes predisposing to the disease. As a result, a number of candidate association genes in different ethnic groups have been identified, and some genes have been linked to specific lupus manifestations. Particularly where familial disease occurs in childhood, and especially when it occurs prior to puberty, complement deficiencies and other immunologic defects should be explored. Evidence of other forms of autoimmunity, including autoimmune thyroiditis and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), is common in families with SLE. Familial APS is uncommon in the absence of other thrombophilic defects, but occasionally is seen with apparent autosomal dominant inheritance. Thus far, no firm gene associations have been identified for APS, in part because of the rarity of multiplex families to study. A search for other familial causes of thrombotic disease should be performed when APS occurs in more than one family member.

Antinuclear antibody and anti-RNA-protein autoantibodies were determined in 143 sera containing paraproteins and 39 control sera. Antinuclear antibodies were commonly present in the paraprotein sera by indirect immunofluorescence. 19 of 143 sera (13%) had elevated anti-Ro/SSA activity in a solid phase Ro/ SSA binding assay, and 5 (3.5%) had Ro/SSA precipitating autoantibody. Eighteen sera had La/SSB binding autoantibodies (12%) but only one had an anti-La/SSB precipitin. AntinRNP(Sm) was not detected in any of these sera.The solid phase anti-RNA protein assays were repeated using anti-X and anti-ic conjugates. l~oth X and K light chain autoantibodies were found in all positive sera consistent with polyclonal anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB responses. Paraprotein sera containing Ro/SSA precipitins were analyzed by isoelectric focusing followed by exposure to '25I-labeled Ro/SSA and autoradiography. All sera with anti-Ro/SSA binding paraproteins also contained polyclonal anti-Ro/SSA. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that anti-Ro/SSA paraproteins are common and arise from a previously present polyclonal anti-Ro/SSA response.

We composed a model from autoimmune serologic findings, HLA antigens, and clinical findings that explains, at least partially, the clinical heterogeneity of 40 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In these patients, anti–Ro (SS‐A) was related to the HLA–DQ1/DQ2 heterozygotes, anti–La (SS‐B) was related to HLA–B8 and HLA–DR3, and anti–nuclear RNP (Sm) was related to HLA–DR4. Lymphopenia was associated with anti–Ro (SS‐A) and, secondarily, with anti‐single‐stranded DNA. Renal disease in these SLE patients was inversely associated with anti–La (SS‐B) and was positively associated with anti–double‐stranded DNA. There were no associations between the HLA antigens and these clinical manifestations. The results support a model of disease expression in which individuals are nonspecifically potentiated for SLE. Their HLA antigen composition influences the production of particular autoantibodies that are related in complex ways to the different particular clinical findings of SLE manifested in individual patients.