IntroductionAppendiceal injuries following a blunt abdominal trauma are rare. Upon literature review, several cases have been reported to develop appendicitis following blunt abdominal trauma, but total transection of the appendix is extremely rare.Case presentationOur case involves a 24-year-old male restrained driver who was involved in a motor vehicle accident. He had bruising corresponding to the pattern of the seatbelt, the ‘seatbelt sign’, on admission. On his second day of admission, he was found to have a rigid abdomen. On exploratory laparotomy, the patient had a completely transected appendix with a 10 × 10 cm piece of transected omentum lying in the pelvic cavity.DiscussionLiterature suggests that seat belts may play a role in the mechanism of injury leading to transection.ConclusionSince the introduction of seatbelt in the 1970s, fatalities from road traffic accidents have fallen by up to 60%. However, the seat belt itself is associated with a unique injury profile, including intestinal tears, perforations, and transections, collectively termed “the seatbelt syndrome”. Seat belt syndrome injuries may sometimes have a delayed presentation, thus repeated abdominal examination is recommended even if the patient is initially stable. Appendiceal transection is rare but may occur. A thorough inspection of the abdominal soft tissue to look for accompanying injuries is important if case an exploratory laparotomy is warranted.

IntroductionUterine inversion is an uncommon condition characterized by the invagination of the fundus of the uterus through the vagina and is extremely rare in non-pregnancy settings. Non-puerperal uterine inversion is usually precipitated by tumours exerting traction force on the fundus of the uterus, turning the uterus partially or completely inside out. It is most frequently associated with benign tumours such as submucosal leiomyomas; however, malignant tumours are a rare association.Case PresentationA 67-year-old woman, G18P18, presented to the emergency department with a bleeding mass that had acutely prolapsed out of the vagina. She had a two-year history of postmenopausal bleeding but had not sought medical advice. She underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pathological evaluation revealed an adenosarcoma of the uterine fundus, measuring 6 cm in its largest diameter, which invaded the myometrium only superficially. The patient recovered well from the operation with no complications and was referred to an oncologist for further treatment. A computerized tomography scan with intravenous contrast showed no evidence of metastasis.ConclusionUterine sarcoma is a malignant tumour of the uterus that typically presents with vaginal bleeding, and rarely as prolapsed uterine inversion. Uterine inversion rarely occurs outside the puerperal setting; however, when it does occur, the possibility of an underlying malignancy should not be neglected.