No abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The predominant coagulation abnormalities in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggest a hypercoagulable state and are consistent with uncontrolled clinical observations of an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. <b><i>Aim and Objectives:</i></b> To compare the effect of prophylactic versus therapeutic doses of enoxaparin in the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19 infection. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This was a retrospective observational study conducted at Latifa hospital, Dubai. Fifty-nine patients enrolled from March to June 2020 and divided into 2 groups: patients who received the prophylactic dose of enoxaparin (group 1) and patients who received the therapeutic dose of enoxaparin (group 2). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age of all cases was 47.2 ± 10.4 years, while the mean weight was 76.4 ± 13.4 kg. Males represented 79.7% of cases. Blood group “O” was the most frequent blood group (40.9%). None of the cases were smokers or using alcohol. Bronchial asthma, lung diseases, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, CKD, cardiac disease, thyroid disease, and immunodeficiency were present in 1.7, 1.7, 39, 27.1, 5.1, 1.7, 5.1, and 1.7% respectively. There was no significant difference between both study groups regarding personal and medical characteristics, except for hypertension where 35.9% of group 2 (therapeutic) cases were hypertensive compared to 10% of group 1 cases (prophylactic). There was a significant difference between both study groups regarding inflammatory markers improvement duration, duration of MV and O₂ support duration, with longer duration among (therapeutic) group 2 cases compared to group 1 cases (prophylactic). There was a highly significant difference between both study groups regarding ICU admission, as 64% of group 1 cases were admitted compared to 25% of group 1 cases. Similarly, 38.5% of group 2 cases needed MV compared to only 10% of group 1 cases, which was statistically significant. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding bleeding tendency and mortality (<i>p</i> value 0.54). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our results showed that use of prophylactic dose of enoxaparin might have some benefits compared to the therapeutic dose in terms of less duration of ICU and hospital stay, duration of oxygen support, need and duration of MV, and normalization of inflammatory markers. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 regimens regarding the mortality.

Background: Meningoencephalocele is a rare congenital anomaly that is characterized by herniation of brain tissue through a defect in skull. Generally, it could be divided by anatomical location of defect to occipital and frontoethmoidal. The exact etiology of this condition is unknown but many theories have been postulated. The condition is usually seen at birth but can be identified prenatally. Case presentation: A newborn was brought to the hospital after a normal non-complicated vaginal delivery done by the ambulance personnel. The newborn had a bulging mass on the posterior aspect of the head. Therefore, he was admitted and neurosurgical consultation was done for further evaluation. Currently the patient is following up in well baby clinic as well as the neurosurgery clinic for normal development and milestones acquisition. Conclusions: This case presents the opportunity for junior healthcare professionals to learn about a group of congenital neurological disorder in the content of a rare case presentation.

Objective Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disorder that is one of the main preventable causes of blindness among preterm neonates. This study aimed to determine the incidence of ROP and investigate the relationship between perinatal risk factors and ROP development. Methods This retrospective, non-interventional, non-comparative, hospital-based study was conducted at a tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit. A total of 163 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited in this study. Results ROP prevalence was 0.01. During the study period, 44 patients developed ROP (27%), and 119 (73%) did not. Stage I ROP was detected in 8 patients (4.9%); stage II ROP without plus-disease in 26 patients (16%); stage II disease with comorbidities in 1 patient (0.6%); and stage III disease in 9 patients (5.5%). None of the patients showed stage IV and V disease. The mean gestational age was 27.7 ± 2.08 weeks in babies who had ROP and 29.59 ± 1.80 weeks in the other group. Neonates with ROP required more frequent blood transfusion (average, 4.89 ± 3.164 transfusions) compared to their counterparts who received an average of 1.19 ± 1.733 transfusions. Intracranial haemorrhage was identified in 55 (33.7%) patients, of whom 14.1% had ROP. Moreover, neonatal seizures occurred in 23 (14.11%) babies and were more common among babies who had ROP (n = 14). Conclusion This study identified key factors associated with ROP, such as intracranial haemorrhage with or without neonatal seizures and a high frequency of blood transfusions.

No abstract