PURPOSE To report normal macular thickness measurements and assess reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements acquired by a time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT)(Stratus [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA]) and three commercially available spectral / Fourier domain OCT instruments (Cirrus HD-OCT [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA], RTVue-100 [Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA], 3D OCT-1000 [Topcon, Inc., Paramus, NJ, USA]). METHODS Forty randomly selected eyes of 40 normal, healthy volunteers were imaged. Subjects were scanned twice during one visit and a subset of 25 was scanned again within 8 weeks. Retinal thickness measurements were automatically generated by OCT software and recorded after manual correction. Regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare agreement between instruments. Reproducibility was analyzed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and incidence of artifacts was determined. RESULTS Macular thickness measurements were found to have high reproducibility across all instruments, with ICC values ranging 84.8–94.9% for Stratus OCT; 92.6–97.3% for Cirrus Cube; 76.4–93.7% for RTVue MM5, 61.1–96.8% for MM6; 93.1–97.9% for 3D OCT-1000 Radial, 31.5–97.5% for 3D Macular scans. Incidence of artifacts was higher in spectral / Fourier domain instruments, ranging 28.75 to 53.16%, compared to 17.46% in Stratus OCT. No significant age or gender trends were found in the measurements. CONCLUSIONS Commercial spectral / Fourier domain OCT instruments provide higher speed and axial resolution than the Stratus OCT, although they vary greatly in scanning protocols and are currently limited in their analysis functions. Further development of segmentation algorithms and quantitative features are needed to assist clinicians in objective use of these newer instruments to manage diseases.
PURPOSE-To report the frequency of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan artifacts and compare macular thickness measurements, inter-scan reproducibility and inter-device agreeability across three spectral / Fourier domain (SD) OCTs (Cirrus HD-OCT, RTVue-100 and Topcon 3D-OCT 1000) and one time domain (TD) OCT (Stratus OCT). METHODS-Two scans were performed for each of the SD-OCT protocols: Cirrus macular cube 512×128, RTVue (E)MM5 and MM6, Topcon 3D macular and radial, in addition to one TD-OCT scan via Stratus macular thickness protocol. Scans were inspected for six types of OCT scan artifacts and analyzed. Inter-scan reproducibility and inter-device agreeability were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots, respectively. DESIGN-ProspectiveMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE-OCT image artifacts, Macular thickness, Reproducibility, Agreeability.RESULTS-TD-OCT scans contained a significantly higher percentage of clinically significant improper central foveal thickness (IFT) post-manual correction (greater than or equal to 11 μm
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.