Contemporary biblical scholarship is changing at a rapid pace. The variety of methods for interpreting the Bible has increased dramatically in recent years, as is shown, for example, by the growing interest in literary approaches such as narrative criticism, and in approaches focused on areas outside both literary and biblical research, for instance, the articles on biblical themes as interpreted in the cinema. The past twenty-five years have seen a growing interest by biblical scholars in structuralist criticism, reader response criticism, rhetorical criticism, social-scientific criticism, feminist interpretation, ideological criticism, and deconstructive criticism, in addition to major advances in the work being done on the broader contexts within which ancient Israel and early Christianity developed. Long-standing methods of research have undergone substantial reappraisal, as, for instance, in the areas of 'biblical' archaeology and the history of early Israel. The field now reaches well beyond the encompassing historicalcritical consensus that had dominated biblical scholarship throughout most of the twentieth century. This increasing variety and flexibility in method has added richness and depth to our understanding of the Bible and its contextual world. The growing variety of approaches is healthy and energizing, and indicates the vitality of contemporary biblical scholarship. However, this variety also makes it very difficult for scholars, especially those who teach or write across a broad spectrum of biblical studies, to stay informed about the numerous recent developments in the many different areas of biblical scholarship. Add to this the virtual explosion in books, journals, Festschriften, encyclopedias and online sites, and one can immediately see the need for a journal to keep readers apprised of recent developments in this rapidly expanding field of scholarship. Given this increasing diversity of methods and interests in contemporary biblical scholarship, the need for Currents is even clearer today than it was when the first issue was published in 1993. Currents also welcomes proposals for articles relating to all facets of Judaism in the late Second Temple and early Rabbinic periods. This includes, but is not limited to, essays on recent research in Pseudepigrapha, Qumran, Mishnah, Midrash and Talmud, as well as studies on ancient Jewish interpreters such as Josephus and Philo. We are especially interested in articles that address texts and issues of interest to the field of biblical studies, broadly conceived. Jonathan Klawans looks forward schuyler kaufman
The theory that Israel's origin lies in a socio-economic revolution, a peasants' rebellion sparked throughout Palestine by the ethically oriented religion of Yahweh, has recently gained wide audience. The methodological presuppositions which underlie this theory have not, however, been critically evaluated. this paper presents such an evaluation, focusing on the socio-economic view of history which provides the framework for the theory, and on the ethical interpretation of Israelite religion which provides the impetus for the reconstructed revolution. The theory is also examined in terms of its relationship to the biblical traditions treating Israel's takeover of Palestine, and in terms of its inherent probability.]The Israelite conquest of Palestine constitutes one of the most perplexing and debatable problems in the study of early Israelite history /1/. Some, most notably those belonging to the Albright school, have chosen to take the traditions in the book of Joshua fairly seriously, and have elected to describe the conquest as a major invasion of Palestine by united Israelite groups /2/. While not taking all the details in the Joshua traditions as historically accurate, they have leaned heavily on archaeology as a tool for validating the basic structure of the Joshua traditions. A second school of thought, mainly exemplified in Alt and his student Noth, claims that the settlement of semi-nomads, rather than conquest, was the means whereby Israel established herself in Palestine /3/. Archaeology is seen to give, at best, only oblique evidence concerning this issue, and the conquest traditions are viewed as aetiological creations of later generations of Israelites. A third alternative, advanced
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.