No abstract

No abstract

Dynamic aeroelastic behaviour of structurally nonlinear Joined Wings is presented.Three configurations, two characterized by a different location of the joint and one presenting a direct connection between the two wings (Sensorcraft-like layout) are investigated.As a first step, the snap-divergence is studied from a dynamic perspective in order to assess the real response of the configuration. Later on, the investigations focus on the flutter occurrence (critical state) and go further in analyzing postcritical phenomena: Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCOs) are observed followed by a lost of periodicity of the solution as speed is further increased. In some cases, it is also possible to ascertain the presence of period doubling (flip-) bifurcation.Differences between flutter (Hopf 's bifurcation) speed evaluated with linear and nonlinear analyses are discussed in depth, in order to understand if a less computationally intense approach may be used with confidence.Both frequency and time-domain approaches are compared. Moreover, aerodynamic solvers based on the potential flow are critically examined and discussed. In particular, it is assessed in what measure the use of more sophisticated (and computationally more intensive) aerodynamic and interface models impacts the aeroelastic predictions. These differences range from the methods adopted for load transferring to the models employed to describe the wake.When the use of the tools gives different results, a physical interpretation of the leading mechanism generating the mismatch is provided. In particular, for PrandtlPlane-like configurations the aeroelastic response is very sensitive to the wake's shape. As a consequence, it is suggested that a more sophisticated modelling of the wake positively impacts the reliability of aerodynamic and aeroelastic analysis.For Sensorcraft-like configurations some LCOs are characterized by a non-synchronous motion of the inner and outer portion of the lower wing: the wings' tip exhibits a small oscillation during the descending or ascending phase, whereas the mid-span station describes a sinusoidal-like trajectory in the time domain.