This is an investigation into nurses' practice of when they would not take and record a patient's respiratory rate. It reports results of qualitative, descriptive research involving interviews with ten ward nurses from three hospitals in New Zealand. Results affirm that, despite it being the most sensitive vital sign for managing patients, nurses acknowledged circumstances in which respiratory rate taking was missed. Reasons were complex and, contrary to expectations, not always associated with the introduction of technology to record other vital signs. Time pressures, work interruptions and rationalised judgements made by experienced nurses all contributed to incidences of missed respiratory rate taking. It is concluded that patient respiratory rate measures do not seem to be highly valued, calling into questions nurses' level of understanding of respiratory physiology, as well as the extent to which intuitive nursing practice is supported by critical analysis.

With the increasing burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in New Zealand (NZ) the number of people requiring pre-dialysis care is increasing. Pre-dialysis nurses play a central role in the delivery of this care. This paper describes and discusses what pre-dialysis nurses perceive to be key influences on effective pre-dialysis nursing care in NZ. It is based on findings from a wider qualitative study that interviewed the majority of NZ pre-dialysis nurses. Following inductive data analysis four main influences were identified. They were: having time from referral to commencement of renal replacement therapy (RRT) to provide adequate education and support; having good access to cultural and other supports and an understanding of differing cultural views of health; the importance of good inter-professional relationships; and support from nursing management and doctors to advance professionally. With the knowledge of the projected increase in patients with CKD, we argue that it is important to ensure the positive aspects of these influences are enhanced in order to ensure effective pre-dialysis nursing care, nurse satisfaction and professional advancement.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore how nurses make decisions to ration care or leave it undone within a clinical environment that is controlled by systems level cost containment. The authors wanted to find out what professional, personal and organisational factors contribute to that decision-making process. This work follows previous international research that explored missed nursing care using Kalisch and Williams' MISSCARE survey. Design/methodology/approach The authors drew on the care elements used by Kalisch and Williams, asking nurses to tell us how they decided what care to leave out, the conduits for which could include delaying care during a shift, delegating care to another health professional on the same shift, handing care over to staff on the next shift or leaving care undone. Findings The findings suggest that nurses do not readily consider their accountability when deciding what care to leave or delay, instead their priorities focus on the patient and the organisation, the outcomes for which are frequently achieved by completing work after a shift. Originality/value The actions of nurses implicitly rationing care is largely hidden from view, the consequences for which potentially have far reaching effects to the nurses and the patients. This paper raised awareness to hidden issues facing nurses within a cycle of implicitly rationing care, caught between wanting to provide care to their patients, meeting the organisation's directives and ensuring professional safety. Rethinking how care is measured to reflect its unpredictable nature is essential.

Purpose: In the current health climate, the length of stay of cardiac patients in hospital has been decreasing, and this has significantly reduced the time nurses and colleagues have for providing inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The purpose of this research was to determine if inpatient CR has an influence on outpatient cardiac rehabilitation attendance for women, M aori, and older people.

This article examines nurses' commentaries from a survey conducted in New Zealand that studied contradictions between quality assurance and work intensification in nursing care. Nurse managers were blamed for either avoiding or not recognizing work intensification affecting quality care delivery. However, the data illustrate key structural issues resulting in missed care that impact on patient safety, rather than a problem directly attributable to managers. Until these structural issues are addressed, missed care and adverse events will continue to affect the quality of care.