The presence of latent reservoirs has prevented the eradication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from infected patients successfully treated with anti‐retroviral therapy. The mechanism of postintegration latency is poorly understood, partly because of the lack of an in vitro model. We have used an HIV retroviral vector or a full‐length HIV genome expressing green fluorescent protein to infect a T lymphocyte cell line in vitro and highly enrich for latently infected cells. HIV latency occurred reproducibly, albeit with low frequency, during an acute infection. Clonal cell lines derived from latent populations showed no detectable basal expression, but could be transcriptionally activated after treatment with phorbol esters or tumor necrosis factor α. Direct sequencing of integration sites demonstrated that latent clones frequently contain HIV integrated in or close to alphoid repeat elements in heterochromatin. This is in contrast to a productive infection where integration in or near heterochromatin is disfavored. These observations demonstrate that HIV can reproducibly establish a latent infection as a consequence of integration in or near heterochromatin.

Ribonucleotide reductases provide the building blocks for DNA replication in all living cells. Three different classes of enzymes use protein free radicals to activate the substrate. Aerobic class I enzymes generate a tyrosyl radical with an ironoxygen center and dioxygen, class II enzymes employ adenosylcobalamin, and the anaerobic class III enzymes generate a glycyl radical from S-adenosylmethionine and an iron-sulfur cluster. The X-ray structure of the class I Escherichia coli enzyme, including forms that bind substrate and allosteric effectors, confirms previous models of catalytic and allosteric mechanisms. This structure suggests considerable mobility of the protein during catalysis and, together with experiments involving site-directed mutants, suggests a mechanism for radical transfer from one subunit to the other. Despite large differences between the classes, common catalytic and allosteric mechanisms, as well as retention of critical residues in the protein sequence, suggest a similar tertiary structure and a common origin during evolution. One puzzling aspect is that some organisms contain the genes for several different reductases. CONTENTS

Because of the heterogeneity of chromatin, the site of integration of human immunode®ciency virus (HIV) in the genome could have dramatic effects on its transcriptional activity. We have used an HIV-1-derived retroviral vector, in which the green¯uorescent protein is under the control of the HIV promoter, to generate by infection 34 Jurkat clonal cell lines each containing a single integration of the HIV-1 vector. In the absence of Tat, a 75-fold difference in expression level between the highest and lowest expressing clones was observed. Basal promoter activity was low in 80% of the clones and moderate to high in the remaining 20% of clones. We found that differences in expression levels are due to the integration site and are not controlled by DNA methylation or histone acetylation. Tat activated transcription in each clone, and an inverse correlation was observed between basal transcriptional activity and inducibility by Tat. These observations demonstrate that the chromatin environment in¯uences basal HIV gene expression and that the HIV Tat protein activates transcription independently of the chromatin environment.

How genes are regulated in the context of chromatin is a central question of biology. Steroid hormones control gene expression via interaction of their receptors with target sequences on DNA but can also activate cytoplasmic signaling cascades. Here we report that rapid Erk activation by progestins participates in induction of target genes by preparing the chromatin for transcription. Five minutes after hormone treatment, Erk activation leads to phosphorylation of the progesterone receptor (PR), activation of Msk1, and recruitment of a complex of the three proteins to a nucleosome on the MMTV promoter. Msk1 phosphorylates histone H3, leading to displacement of HP1gamma and recruitment of Brg1 and RNA polymerase II. Cell-free experiments show a direct interaction between PR, Erk, and Msk1 and support the importance of H3 phosphorylation for nucleosome remodeling. Inhibition of Msk1 activation blocks recruitment of the kinase complex, H3 phosphorylation, and HP1gamma displacement, thus precluding remodeling and induction of the promoter.