The classical DNA aptamer for adenosine and ATP was selected twice using ATP as the target in 1995 and 2005, respectively. In 2022, this motif appeared four more times from selections using adenosine, ATP, theophylline, and caffeine as targets, suggesting that this aptamer can also bind methylxanthines. In this work, using thioflavin T fluorescence spectroscopy, this classical DNA aptamer showed K d values for adenosine, theophylline, and caffeine of 9.5, 101, and 131 μM, respectively, and similar K d values were obtained using isothermal titration calorimetry. Binding to the methylxanthines was also observed for the newly selected Ade1301 aptamer but not for the Ade1304 aptamer. The RNA aptamer for ATP also had no binding to the methylxanthines. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the classical DNA and RNA aptamers based on their NMR structures, and the simulation results were consistent with the experimental observations, explaining the selectivity profiles. This study suggests that a broader range of target analogues need to be tested for aptamers. For the detection of adenosine and ATP, the Ade1304 aptamer is a better choice due to its better selectivity.

Chloramphenicol (CAP) is a potent antibiotic. Due to its side effects, CAP is currently banned in most countries, but it is still found in many food products and in the environment. Developing aptamer-based biosensors for the detection of CAP has interested many researchers. While both RNA and DNA aptamers were previously reported for CAP, they were all obtained by immobilization of the CAP base, which omitted the two chlorine atoms. In this work, DNA aptamers were selected using the library-immobilized method and free unmodified CAP. Three families of aptamers were obtained, and the best one named CAP1 showed a dissociation constant (K d) of 9.8 μM using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). A fluorescent strand-displacement sensor showed a limit of detection (LOD) of 14 μM CAP. Thioflavin T (ThT) staining allowed label-free detection of CAP with a LOD of 1 μM in buffer, 1.8 μM in Lake Ontario water, and 3.6 μM in a wastewater sample. Comparisons were made with previously reported aptamers, and ITC failed to show binding of a previously reported 80-mer aptamer. Due to the small size and well-defined secondary structures of CAP1, this aptamer will find analytical applications for environmental and food monitoring.

Using DNA staining dyes such as SYBR Green I (SGI) and thioflavin T (ThT) to perform label-free detection of aptamer binding has been performed for a long time for both binding assays and biosensor development. Since these dyes are cationic, they can also adsorb to the wall of reaction vessels leading to unstable signals and even false interpretations of the results. In this work, the stability of the signal was first evaluated using ThT and the classic adenosine aptamer. In a polystyrene microplate, a drop in fluorescence was observed even when non-binding targets or water were added, whereas a more stable signal was achieved in a quartz cuvette. Equilibrating the system can also improve signal stability. In addition, a few polymers and surfactants were also screened, and 0.01% Triton X-100 was found to have the best protection effect against fluorescence signal decrease due to dye adsorption. Three aptamers for Hg2+, adenosine, and cortisol were tested for their sensitivity and signal stability in the absence and presence of Triton X-100. In each case, the sensitivity was similar, whereas the signal stability was better for the surfactant. This study indicates that careful control experiments need to be designed to ensure reliable results and that the reliability can be improved by using Triton X-100 and a long equilibration time.