ImportanceImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival outcomes of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in both first- and second-line settings. However, the benefit of ICIs in patients with low programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains unclear.ObjectiveTo derive survival data for patient subgroups with low PD-L1 expression from clinical trials comparing ICIs with chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and to perform a pooled analysis.Data SourcesKaplan-Meier curves from the randomized clinical trials were extracted after a systematic search of Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception until October 1, 2021.Study SelectionRandomized clinical trials that investigated the effectiveness of anti–PD-1–based regimens for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and that reported overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, or duration of response were included in this meta-analysis.Data Extraction and SynthesisKaplan-Meier curves of all-comer populations, subgroups with high PD-L1, and those with low PD-L1 (when available) were extracted from published articles. A graphic reconstructive algorithm was used to calculate time-to-event outcomes from these curves. In studies with unreported curves for subgroups with low PD-L1 expression, KMSubtraction was used to impute survival data. KMSubtraction is a workflow to derive unreported subgroup survival data with from subgroups. An individual patient data pooled analysis including previously reported and newly imputed subgroups was conducted for trials with the same treatment line and PD-L1 scoring system. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcomes included Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios (HRs) for OS for subgroups with low PD-L1 expression. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and duration of response.ResultsThe randomized clinical trials CheckMate-648, ESCORT-1st, KEYNOTE-590, ORIENT-15, KEYNOTE-181, ESCORT, RATIONALE-302, ATTRACTION-3, and ORIENT-2 were included, totaling 4752 patients. In the pooled analysis of first-line trials that evaluated a tumor proportion score (CheckMate-648 and ESCORT-1st), no significant benefit in OS was observed with immunochemotherapy compared with chemotherapy in the subgroup of patients who had a tumor proportion score lower than 1% (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12; P = .38) compared with chemotherapy. In the pooled analysis of first-line trials that evaluated combined positive score (KEYNOTE-590 and ORIENT-15), there was a significant but modest OS benefit for immunochemotherapy compared with chemotherapy in the subgroup with a combined positive score lower than 10 (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94; P = .01).Conclusions and RelevanceFindings suggest a lack of survival benefit of ICI-based regimens in the first-line setting compared with chemotherapy alone in the subgroup with a tumor proportion score lower than 1%.

ImportanceTransgender and gender-diverse individuals face unique challenges, including barriers to health care access and inequities in treatment, that may influence cancer risk and outcomes.ObservationsIn this narrative review, a scoping review was conducted focusing on primary and secondary prevention and epidemiology of cancer, barriers to health care services, and health care practitioners’ knowledge about specific issues pertaining to transgender and gender-diverse individuals. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase, were reviewed for citations from their inception to December 31, 2021. This review revealed that transgender and gender-diverse people had a high prevalence of tobacco consumption and alcohol use and high rates of infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) and HIV. Transgender and gender-diverse individuals were less likely to adhere to cancer screening programs and had a higher incidence of HIV- and HPV-associated cancers. Social and economic determinants seemed to drive these disparities in risk factors and outcomes. A lack of knowledge about gender minorities’ health needs among health care practitioners was evidenced, and it represented a major hurdle to cancer prevention, care, and survivorship for transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Discrimination, discomfort caused by gender-labeled oncological services, stigma, and lack of cultural sensitivity of health care practitioners were other barriers met by transgender and gender-diverse persons in the oncology setting.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings suggest that transgender and gender-diverse peoples’ needs in the cancer care continuum are not optimally addressed. Effective solutions are needed to offer the best care to every patient in a person-centric and gender diversity–sensitive environment.

Background: Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated immunotherapy-based regimens versus chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and activity of programmed cell death protein 1 blockade in these patients, with focus on the value of programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) for selecting patients who may benefit the most. Methods: RCTs investigating treatment with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced ESCC were selected. The hazard ratio (HR) and the odds ratio were used to compare the treatment effect on survival outcomes and tumor response, respectively, for immunotherapy-based regimens compared with standard chemotherapy, overall and according to geographic region or treatment line. We carried out a subgroup analysis comparing patients with CPS !10 or <10 and the evidence for treatment effect was evaluated by interaction test. Results: A total of 5257 patients and 10 RCTs were included. Overall, the HR for overall survival benefit with immunotherapy-based regimens was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.76] compared with chemotherapy alone; such effect was independent from geographical region (Asia versus rest of the world) and treatment line (upfront versus second/further lines). The HR for progression-free survival benefit and the odds ratio for overall response rate increase were 0.78 (95% CI 0.66-0.93) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.22-1.83), respectively. The HR for overall survival benefit with immunotherapy-based treatment was 0.60 (95% CI 0.51-0.70) for CPS !10 subgroup versus 0.83 (95% CI 0.69-1.00) for CPS <10 (P for interaction 0.009). Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have a consistent benefit in reducing the risk of death for ESCC patients which is dependent on programmed death-ligand 1 CPS status. Further investigations of biomarkers for immunotherapy in the subgroup of patients with CPS <10 are needed.

358 Background: In resectable GAC/GEJAC, MSI status is associated with better survival and potential lack of benefit from chemotherapy. Given the high responsiveness of MSI tumors to immunotherapy, neoadjuvant or definitive dual CTLA-4/PD(L)-1 inhibition may allow omission of chemotherapy or surgery. Methods: INFINITY is a multicentre, single-arm, multi-cohort phase II trial (NCT04817826) investigating the activity and safety of tremelimumab+durvalumab as neoadjuvant (Cohort 1) or definitive (Cohort 2) treatment for MSI, mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and EBV-negative resectable GAC/GEJAC. In Cohort 1, patients (pts) received a 12-week treatment with single high dose tremelimumab 300 mg and durvalumab 1500 mg q4 weeks (T300/D) for 3 cycles followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pCR rate (ypT0N0) with negative ctDNA after T300/D. Secondary endpoints: disease-free survival, overall survival, quality of life. Exploratory: correlation of pCR with clinical variables, PDL-1 CPS assessed by IHC 22C3, tumor mutational burden (TMB) by Foundation One, liquid biopsies and other biomarkers. Cohort 2 investigates non operative management after same treatment regimen. Results: Overall, 18 pts with MSI/dMMR resectable cT2-4 any N GAC/GEJAC were recruited in Cohort 1. One withdrew consent and 2 achieved a complete clinical-pathological response at radiology and endoscopy (ongoing) and refused surgery. Among 15 evaluable patients, 1 had disease progression and 14 underwent resection. pCR rate was 60% (9/15) and major-complete pathological response (<10% viable cells) was 80%. All pts with pCR had negative ctDNA status pre-surgery. pCR rate was 1/6 (17%) in T4 vs 8/9 (89%) in T2-3 tumors (p=0.011), whereas no correlation was found with baseline N status. PDL-1 CPS was not associated with outcomes and TMB had a non-significant trend of correlation with pCR (median TMB 26 in non-pCR vs 40 in pCR group, p=0.2). Grade≥3 immune-related AEs occurred in 3 pts of safety population (n=18): colitis, pneumonitis, liver toxicity, all resolved with high dose steroids and did not impair surgery. Two pts died after surgery for other reasons than disease or AEs, whereas no disease relapses were observed in remaining pts. QoL and additional translational analyses on RNA-seq, digital spatial profiling and ctDNA monitoring will be presented. Conclusions: Pre-operative T300/D for 3 months was safe and provided promising proof of efficacy in MSI, dMMR GAC/GEJAC pts. These results open the way to investigate NOM in pts with clinical, pathological and molecular (ctDNA minimal residual disease) complete response after T300/D. Enrollment in Cohort 2 has started after IDMC evaluation and protocol. amendment to include only pts with cT2-3 tumors confirmed at staging laparoscopy. Clinical trial information: NCT04817826 .

Background: The safety and efficacy outcome of elderly metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients fit enough to receive combination chemotherapy plus biological agents is an issue of growing interest. Also, gender-specific differential toxicity and efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-based upfront treatments need to be explored. Patients and methods: Valentino was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, investigating two panitumumab-based maintenance strategies following first-line panitumumab plus FOLFOX in RAS wild-type mCRC patients. We carried out a subgroup analysis, aimed at assessing the differences in efficacy, safety and quality of life (QoL) according to age (<70 versus 70 years) and gender (male versus female). Efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR); safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). Results: No significant differences in terms of PFS, OS and ORR were observed between patients aged <70 or 70 years and the effect of the maintenance treatment arm on survival outcomes was similar in the two subgroups. The safety profile of both induction and maintenance treatment and the impact on QoL were similar in elderly and younger patients. No significant differences in PFS, OS, ORR or clinical benefit rate were observed according to gender. A significantly higher rate of overall grade 3/4 AEs (P ¼ 0.008) and of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (P ¼ 0.017), any grade and grade 3/4 neutropenia (P < 0.0001) and any grade conjunctivitis (P ¼ 0.033) was reported in female as compared to male patients. Conversely, we reported a significantly higher incidence of any grade skin rash (P ¼ 0.0007) and hypomagnesemia (P ¼ 0.029) in male patients. Conclusions: The upfront choice of an anti-EGFR-based doublet chemotherapy followed by a maintenance strategy represents a valuable option in RAS wild-type mCRC irrespective of gender and age, though a careful evaluation of patients to maximize the risk/benefit ratio is warranted.