Humans are infected with two types of EBV (Type 1 (T1) and Type 2 (T2)) that differ substantially in their EBNA2 and EBNA 3A/B/C latency proteins and have different phenotypes in B cells. T1 EBV transforms B cells more efficiently than T2 EBV in vitro, and T2 EBV-infected B cells are more lytic. We previously showed that both increased NFATc1/c2 activity, and an NFAT-binding motif within the BZLF1 immediate-early promoter variant (Zp-V3) contained in all T2 strains, contribute to lytic infection in T2 EBV-infected B cells. Here we compare cellular and viral gene expression in early-passage lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) infected with either T1 or T2 EBV strains. Using bulk RNA-seq, we show that T2 LCLs are readily distinguishable from T1 LCLs, with approximately 600 differentially expressed cellular genes. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) suggests that T2 LCLs have increased B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling, NFAT activation, and enhanced expression of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition-associated genes. T2 LCLs also have decreased RNA and protein expression of a cellular gene required for survival of T1 LCLs, IRF4. In addition to its essential role in plasma cell differentiation, IRF4 decreases BCR signaling. Knock-down of IRF4 in a T1 LCL (infected with the Zp-V3-containing Akata strain) induced lytic reactivation whereas over-expression of IRF4 in Burkitt lymphoma cells inhibited both NFATc1 and NFATc2 expression and lytic EBV reactivation. Single-cell RNA-seq confirmed that T2 LCLs have many more lytic cells compared to T1 LCLs and showed that lytically infected cells have both increased NFATc1, and decreased IRF4, compared to latently infected cells. These studies reveal numerous differences in cellular gene expression in B cells infected with T1 versus T2 EBV and suggest that decreased IRF4 contributes to both the latent and lytic phenotypes in cells with T2 EBV.

Herpesviruses employ extensive bidirectional transcription of overlapping genes to overcome length constraints on their gene product repertoire. As a consequence, many lytic transcripts cannot be measured individually by RT-qPCR or conventional RNA-seq analysis. Bruce et al. (Pathogens 2017, 6, 11; doi:10.3390/pathogens6010011) proposed an approximation method using Unique CoDing Sequences (UCDS) to estimate lytic gene abundance from KSHV RNA-seq data. Although UCDS has been widely employed, its accuracy, to our knowledge, has never been rigorously validated for any herpesvirus. In this study, we use CAGE-seq as a gold-standard to determine the accuracy of UCDS for estimating EBV lytic gene expression levels from RNA-seq data. We also introduce the Unique TranScript (UTS) method that, like UCDS, estimates transcript abundance from changes in mean RNA-seq read-depth. UTS is distinguished by its use of empirically determined 5’ and 3’ transcript ends, rather than coding sequence annotations. Compared to conventional read assignment, both UCDS and UTS improved quantitation accuracy of overlapping genes, with UTS giving the most accurate results. The UTS method discards fewer reads and may be advantageous for experiments with less sequencing depth. UTS is compatible with any aligner and, unlike isoform-aware alignment methods, can be implemented on a laptop computer. Our findings demonstrate that accuracy achieved by complex and expensive techniques such as CAGE-seq can be approximated using conventional short-read RNA-seq data when read assignment methods address transcript overlap. Although our study focuses on EBV transcription, the UTS method should be applicable across all herpesviruses and other genomes with extensively overlapping transcriptomes. IMPORTANCE Many viruses employ extensively overlapping transcript structures. This complexity makes it difficult to quantify gene expression using conventional methods including RNA-seq. Although high-throughput techniques that overcome these limitations exist, they are complex, expensive, and scarce in herpesvirus literature relative to short-read RNA-seq. Here, using Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as a model, we demonstrate that conventional RNA-seq analysis methods fail to accurately quantify abundance of many overlapping transcripts. We further show that the previously described Unique CoDing Sequence (UCDS) and our Unique TranScript (UTS) methods greatly improve the accuracy of EBV lytic gene measurements obtained from RNA-seq data. The UTS method has the advantages of discarding fewer reads and being implementable on a laptop computer. Although this study focuses on EBV, the UCDS and UTS methods should be applicable across herpesviruses and for other viruses that make extensive use of overlapping transcription.

During reactivation from latency, gammaherpesviruses radically restructure their host cell to produce virion particles. To achieve this and thwart cellular defenses, they induce rapid degradation of cytoplasmic mRNAs, suppressing host gene expression. In this article, we review mechanisms of shutoff by Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and other gammaherpesviruses. In EBV, canonical host shutoff is accomplished through the action of the versatile BGLF5 nuclease expressed during lytic reactivation. We explore how BGLF5 induces mRNA degradation, the mechanisms by which specificity is achieved, and the consequences for host gene expression. We also consider non-canonical mechanisms of EBV-induced host shutoff. Finally, we summarize the limitations and barriers to accurate measurements of the EBV host shutoff phenomenon.

Differentiated epithelial cells are an important source of infectious EBV virions in human saliva, and latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is strongly associated with the epithelial cell tumor, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, it has been difficult to model how EBV contributes to NPC, since EBV has not been shown to enhance proliferation of epithelial cells in monolayer culture in vitro and is not stably maintained in epithelial cells without antibiotic selection. In addition, although there are two major types of EBV (type 1 (T1) and type 2 (T2)), it is currently unknown whether T1 and T2 EBV behave differently in epithelial cells. Here we inserted a G418 resistance gene into the T2 EBV strain, AG876, allowing us to compare the phenotypes of T1 Akata virus versus T2 AG876 virus in a telomerase-immortalized normal oral keratinocyte cell line (NOKs) using a variety of different methods, including RNA-seq analysis, proliferation assays, immunoblot analyses, and air-liquid interface culture. We show that both T1 Akata virus infection and T2 AG876 virus infection of NOKs induce cellular proliferation, and inhibit spontaneous differentiation, in comparison to the uninfected cells when cells are grown without supplemental growth factors in monolayer culture. T1 EBV and T2 EBV also have a similar ability to induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) transition and activate canonical and non-canonical NF-κB signaling in infected NOKs. In contrast to our recent results in EBV-infected lymphoblastoid cells (in which T2 EBV infection is much more lytic than T1 EBV infection), we find that NOKs infected with T1 and T2 EBV respond similarly to lytic inducing agents such as TPA treatment or differentiation. These results suggest that T1 and T2 EBV have similar phenotypes in infected epithelial cells, with both EBV types enhancing cellular proliferation and inhibiting differentiation when growth factors are limiting.

The transition from latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection to lytic viral replication is mediated by the viral transcription factors Rta and Zta. Although both are required for virion production, dissecting the specific roles played by Rta and Zta is challenging because they induce each other’s expression. To circumvent this, we constructed an EBV mutant deleted for the genes encoding Rta and Zta (BRLF1 and BZLF1, respectively) in the Akata strain BACmid. This mutant, termed EBVΔRZ, was used to infect several epithelial cell lines, including telomerase-immortalized normal oral keratinocytes, a highly physiologic model of EBV epithelial cell infection. Using RNA-seq, we determined the gene expression induced by each viral transactivator. Surprisingly, Zta alone only induced expression of the lytic origin transcripts BHLF1 and LF3. In contrast, Rta activated the majority of EBV early gene transcripts. As expected, Zta and Rta were both required for expression of late gene transcripts. Zta also cooperated with Rta to enhance a subset of early gene transcripts (Rtasynergy transcripts) that Zta was unable to activate when expressed alone. Interestingly, Rta and Zta each cooperatively enhanced the other’s binding to EBV early gene promoters, but this effect was not restricted to promoters where synergy was observed. We demonstrate that Zta did not affect Rtasynergy transcript stability, but increased Rtasynergy gene transcription despite having no effect on their transcription when expressed alone. Our results suggest that, at least in epithelial cells, Rta is the dominant transactivator and that Zta functions primarily to support DNA replication and co-activate a subset of early promoters with Rta. This closely parallels the arrangement in KSHV where ORF50 (Rta homolog) is the principal activator of lytic transcription and K8 (Zta homolog) is required for DNA replication at oriLyt.