В статье показано, что гендерно маркированный дискурс в англоязычном сегменте Интернета может быть представлен в виде интернет-мемов (текстовых единиц с неопределенной порождающей субъектностью и короткой рецептивной фазой, не имеющих абсолютной универсальной адресованности). Отмечается, что гендерный характер интернет-мема может проявляться в разной степени. Гендерный интернет-мем отличается размытостью его формальных и (или) онтологических границ. Подобное свойство гендерных интернет-мемов актуализируется в большей степени только в подмножестве исследуемых единиц при развертывании гендерного дискурса, который, в свою очередь, также имеет лимологическую функциональную обусловленность. Адрес статьи: www.

The goal of the research is a transdisciplinary reconstruction of the hybrid subject of linguistics. The result of the research is the distinction between the local onomasticon as a linear list of words, separated from spatial and temporal contexts, and the onomastic suite formation. Transdisciplinarity as a methodological principle of research is represented in the actualization of the cenological approach. The concept onomastic suite formation was coined to linguistically explain the excessive derived groupings of different-frequency onyms related to the parent onym and sharing the common cultural-historical context. The onomastic suite formation is interpreted as a dynamic subsystem of semiocoenosis, the elements of which are formally heterogeneous, loosely coupled from the linguistic point of view, but they share spatial and temporal parameters forming homogeneous social-historical contents associated with psycholinguistic, sociolinguistic and linguoculturological factors. The results are based on the analysis of a sample of 4000 onomastic units, which was generated and interpreted in an “all-humanities key” using an integrated methodology (including contextual analysis, method of vocabulary definitions, interviewing, modeling, introspection).

No abstract

The article considers some aspects of linguistic investigation of hybrid objects. Special attention is paid to the linguistic interpretation of hybrid objects within the context of methodological issues represented in the publications of the prominent Soviet and Russian psycholinguist Juri Aleksandrovich Sorokin. This publication is timed to coincide with the 85th anniversary of the birth of the scientist.

The article attempts to define methodological principles for the analysis of models of communicative situations in artistic prose. For this purpose, the provisions of the theory of communication, most important for linguistics (first of all, these are the views of L. Wittgenstein and some other foreign scientists of the ХХ century), are investigated. On the basis of the analyzed views, three principles are singled out, which determine the methodological nature of the interpretation of communicative situations presented in artistic prose: anthropocentric, system-activity and information.