Parkinson's disease (PD) results from a loss of dopaminergic neurons. What triggers the break-down of neuronal signaling, and how this might be compensated, is not understood. The age of onset, progression and symptoms vary between patients, and our understanding of the clinical variability remains incomplete. In this study, we investigate this, by characterizing the dopaminergic landscape in healthy and denervated striatum, using biophysical modelling. Based on currently proposed mechanisms, we model three distinct denervation patterns, and show how this affect the dopaminergic network. Depending on the denervation pattern, we show how local and global differences arise in the activity of striatal neurons. Finally, we use the mathematical formalism to suggest a cellular strategy for maintaining normal dopamine signaling following neuronal denervation. This strategy is characterized by dual enhancement of both the release and uptake capacity of dopamine in the remaining neurons. Overall, our results derive a new conceptual framework for the impaired dopaminergic signaling related to PD and offers testable predictions for future research directions. Significance StatementsParkinson's disease, caused by a loss of dopaminergic neurons, is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Clinically, the age of onset, disease progression, and symptoms are highly variable between patients. Despite this, an understanding of the underlying mechanisms causing this variability is still missing.We here use biophysical modelling and show that the spatial pattern of dopaminergic denervation profoundly affects the anatomy and signaling of the dopaminergic network. We further show that the pattern of denervation has functional consequences for the activity of the downstream projection neurons, critical for the direct and indirect pathways. Our findings are useful in understanding the clinical variability of Parkinson's disease and offers several experientially testable predictions.
Background: Machine-learning models may improve prediction of length of stay (LOS) and morbidity after surgery. However, few studies include fast-track programs, and most rely on administrative coding with limited follow-up and information on perioperative care. This study investigates potential benefits of a machine-learning model for prediction of postoperative morbidity in fast-track total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: Cohort study in consecutive unselected primary THA/TKA between 2014-2017 from seven Danish centers with established fast-track protocols. Preoperative comorbidity and prescribed medication were recorded prospectively and information on length of stay and readmissions was obtained through the Danish National Patient Registry and medical records. We used a machine-learning model based on boosted decision trees with 33 preoperative variables for predicting “medical” morbidity leading to LOS >4 days or 90-days readmissions and compared to a logistical regression model based on the same variables. We also evaluated two parsimonious models, using the ten most important variables in the full machine-learning and logistic regression models. Data collected between 2014-2016 (n:18013) was used for model training and data from 2017 (n:3913) was used for testing. Model performances were analyzed using precision, area under receiver operating (AUROC) and precision recall curves (AUPRC), as well as the Mathews Correlation Coefficient. Variable importance was analyzed using Shapley Additive Explanations values. Results: Using a threshold of 20% “risk-patients” (n:782), precision, AUROC and AUPRC were 13.6%, 76.3% and 15.5% vs. 12.4%, 74.7% and 15.6% for the machine-learning and logistic regression model, respectively. The parsimonious machine-learning model performed better than the full logistic regression model. Of the top ten variables, eight were shared between the machine-learning and logistic regression models, but with a considerable age-related variation in importance of specific types of medication. Conclusion: A machine-learning model using preoperative characteristics and prescriptions slightly improved identification of patients in high-risk of “medical” complications after fast-track THA and TKA compared to a logistic regression model. Such algorithms could help find a manageable population of patients who may benefit most from intensified perioperative care.
Parkinson's disease (PD) results from a loss of dopaminergic neurons. The age of disease onset, its progression and symptoms vary significantly between patients, pointing to a complex relationship between neuron loss and PD etiology. Yet, our understanding of the clinical variability remains incomplete. Here, we use biophysical modelling to investigate the dopaminergic landscape in the healthy and denervated striatum. Based on currently proposed mechanisms causing PD, we model three distinct denervation patterns, and show notable differences in the dopaminergic network as denervation progresses. We find local and global differences in the activity of two types of striatal neurons as a function of the denervation pattern. Finally, we identify the optimal cellular strategy for maintaining normal dopamine signaling when neurons degenerate within our model. Our results derive a conceptual framework in which the clinical variability of PD is rooted in distinct denervation patterns and forms testable predictions for future PD research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.