Within the limitations of this systematic review, it can be concluded that crestal bone levels are better maintained in the short-medium term when internal kinds of interface are adopted. In particular, conical connections seem to be more advantageous, showing lower peri-implant bone loss, but further studies are necessary to investigate the efficacy of implant-abutment connection on stability of crestal bone levels.

BackgroundThe partial edentulous posterior mandible is often a challenge area that requires a bone reconstructive surgery for implants placement.PurposeThis RCT was aimed to evaluate complications rate and vertical bone gain after Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) with dense non‐resorbable d‐PTFE titanium‐reinforced membranes (Group A) versus titanium meshes covered by cross‐linked collagen membranes (Group B).Material and Methods40 partially edentulous patients with atrophic posterior mandible, were randomly divided into two study group: 20 patients were treated with one stage GBR by means of non‐resorbable d‐PTFE titanium‐reinforced membranes (Group A); and 20 patients, by means of titanium mesh covered by cross‐linked collagen membranes (Group B). All complications were recorded, distinguishing between “surgical” and “healing” and between “minor” or “major.”. Primary implants stability and vertical bone gain were also evaluated.ResultsIn the group A, surgical and healing complication rates were 5.0% and 15.0%, respectively. In the group B, surgical and healing complication rates were 15.8% and 21.1%, respectively. No significant differences between two study group were observed regarding complications rate implant stability and vertical bone gain.ConclusionsBoth GBR approaches for the restoration of atrophic posterior mandible achieved similar results regarding complications, vertical bone gain and implant stability.

The ridge preservation procedures had significantly better outcomes when compared to natural healing. The biomaterials did not differ for maintenance of bone width; even though, the bone height seemed to be better preserved with the cortical porcine bone.

The surgical debridement of intraosseous periodontal defects resulted in comparable, substantial CAL gains and PD reductions as well as limited postoperative REC increases when defects were accessed with the SFA or DFA.

This prospective cohort study revealed that SPS implants offer a predictable solution for implant prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with edentulism characterized by different alveolar bone atrophy. From the biomechanical point of view, the C/I ratio would appear to be the main parameter capable of influencing implant success and crestal bone loss. Consequently, it is important not to exceed the threshold values in order to avoid excessive stress at the bone-implant interface capable of resulting in excessive crestal bone loss or implant failure.