Background The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging advanced health systems, which are dealing with an overwhelming number of patients in need of intensive care for respiratory failure, often requiring intubation. Prone positioning in intubated patients is known to reduce mortality in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. We aimed to investigate feasibility and effect on gas exchange of prone positioning in awake, non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. MethodsIn this prospective, feasibility, cohort study, patients aged 18-75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19related pneumonia receiving supplemental oxygen or non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure were recruited from San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. We collected baseline data on demographics, anthropometrics, arterial blood gas, and ventilation parameters. After baseline data collection, patients were helped into the prone position, which was maintained for a minimum duration of 3 h. Clinical data were re-collected 10 min after prone positioning and 1 h after returning to the supine position. The main study outcome was the variation in oxygenation (partial pressure of oxygen [PaO 2 ]/fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air [FiO 2 ]) between baseline and resupination, as an index of pulmonary recruitment. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04365959, and is now complete. Findings Between March 20 and April 9, 2020, we enrolled 56 patients, of whom 44 (79%) were male; the mean age was 57•4 years (SD 7•4) and the mean BMI was 27•5 kg/m² (3•7). Prone positioning was feasible (ie, maintained for at least 3 h) in 47 patients (83•9% [95% CI 71•7 to 92•4]). Oxygenation substantially improved from supine to prone positioning (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio 180•5 mm Hg [SD 76•6] in supine position vs 285•5 mm Hg [112•9] in prone position; p<0•0001). After resupination, improved oxygenation was maintained in 23 patients (50•0% [95% CI 34•9-65•1]; ie, responders); however, this improvement was on average not significant compared with before prone positioning (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio 192•9 mm Hg [100•9] 1 h after resupination; p=0•29). Patients who maintained increased oxygenation had increased levels of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein: 12•7 mg/L [SD 6•9] in responders vs 8•4 mg/L [6•2] in non-responders; and platelets: 241•1 × 10³/µL [101•9] vs 319•8 × 10³/µL [120•6]) and shorter time between admission to hospital and prone positioning (2•7 days [SD 2•1] in responders vs 4•6 days [3•7] in non-responders) than did those for whom improved oxygenation was not maintained. 13 (28%) of 46 patients were eventually intubated, seven (30%) of 23 responders and six (26%) of 23 non-responders (p=0•74). Five patients died during follow-up due to underlying disease, unrelated to study procedure. Interpretation Prone positioning was feasible and effective in rapidly ameliorating blood oxygenation in awake patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia requiring oxygen supplementation. The effect was maintained after resupina...

Comparative 30-day overall mortality 9 Cirrhotics SARS-CoV-2+ vs. Cirrhotics with bacterial infection: 34% (95% CI 23-49) vs. 17% (95% CI 8-32) p = 0.03 9 Cirrhotics SARS-CoV-2+ vs. NON cirrhotics SARS-CoV-2+: 34% (95% CI 23-49) vs. 18% (95% CI 15-22) p = 0.035 patients with cirrhosis SARS-CoV-2 + 30-day mortality rate 34% (95% CI 23-49) Highlights 50 patients with cirrhosis and SARS-CoV-2 infection were studied, with an overall 30-day mortality rate of 34%. Mortality was higher in patients with respiratory failure and in those with worsening liver function at COVID-19 diagnosis. 30-day mortality rates were higher in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19 than in those with bacterial infections. No major adverse events were related to the thromboprophylaxis with heparin (given to 80% of patients) or antiviral treatments.

No abstract

Background Respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with high mortality and may overwhelm health care systems, due to the surge of patients requiring advanced respiratory support. Shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) beds required many patients to be treated outside the ICU despite severe gas exchange impairment. Helmet is an effective interface to provide continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) noninvasively. We report data about the usefulness of helmet CPAP during pandemic, either as treatment, a bridge to intubation or a rescue therapy for patients with care limitations (DNI). Methods In this observational study we collected data regarding patients failing standard oxygen therapy (i.e., non-rebreathing mask) due to COVID-19 pneumonia treated with a free flow helmet CPAP system. Patients’ data were recorded before, at initiation of CPAP treatment and once a day, thereafter. CPAP failure was defined as a composite outcome of intubation or death. Results A total of 306 patients were included; 42% were deemed as DNI. Helmet CPAP treatment was successful in 69% of the full treatment and 28% of the DNI patients (P < 0.001). With helmet CPAP, PaO2/FiO2 ratio doubled from about 100 to 200 mmHg (P < 0.001); respiratory rate decreased from 28 [22–32] to 24 [20–29] breaths per minute, P < 0.001). C-reactive protein, time to oxygen mask failure, age, PaO2/FiO2 during CPAP, number of comorbidities were independently associated with CPAP failure. Helmet CPAP was maintained for 6 [3–9] days, almost continuously during the first two days. None of the full treatment patients died before intubation in the wards. Conclusions Helmet CPAP treatment is feasible for several days outside the ICU, despite persistent impairment in gas exchange. It was used, without escalating to intubation, in the majority of full treatment patients after standard oxygen therapy failed. DNI patients could benefit from helmet CPAP as rescue therapy to improve survival. Trial Registration: NCT04424992

No abstract