Gastric cancer is an active topic of clinical and basic research due to high morbidity and mortality. To date, gastrectomy and chemotherapy are the only therapeutic options for gastric cancer patients, but drug resistance, either acquired or primary, is the main cause for treatment failure. Differences in development and response to cancer treatments have been observed among ethnically diverse GC patient populations. In spite of major incidence, GC Asian patients have a significantly better prognosis and response to treatments than Caucasian ones due to genetic discordances between the two populations. Gene therapy could be an alternative strategy to overcome such issues and especially CRISPR/Cas9 represents one of the most intriguing gene-editing system. Thus, in this review article, we want to provide an update on the currently used therapies for the treatment of advanced GC.

Cancer cells overexpress CAIX under transient and chronic extracellular acidosis. Acidosis-induced CAIX overexpression is NF-κB mediated and HIF-1α independent. FC16-670A prevents CAIX overexpression and induces acidified cancer cell death.

Acidosis characterizes the microenvironment of most solid tumors and is considered a new hallmark of cancer. It is mainly caused by both “aerobic” and “anaerobic” glycolysis of differently adapted cancer cells, with the final product lactic acid being responsible of the extracellular acidification. Many evidences underline the role of extracellular acidosis in tumor progression. Among the different findings, we demonstrated that acidosis-exposed cancer cells are characterized by an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype with high invasive ability, high resistance to apoptosis, anchorage-independent growth, and drug therapy. Acidic melanoma cells over-express SOX2, which is crucial for the maintenance of their oxidative metabolism, and carbonic anhydrase IX, that correlates with poor prognosis of cancer patients. Considering these evidences, we realized that the profile outlined for acid cancer cells inevitably remind us the stemness profile. Therefore, we wondered whether extracellular acidosis might induce in cancer cells the acquisition of stem-like properties and contribute to the expansion of the cancer stem cell sub-population. We found that a chronic adaptation to acidosis stimulates in cancer cells the expression of stem-related markers, also providing a high in vitro/in vivo clonogenic and trans-differentiating ability. Moreover, we observed that the acidosis-induced stem-like phenotype of melanoma cells was reversible and related to the EMT induction. These findings help to characterize a further aspect of stem cell niche, contributing to the sustainment and expansion of cancer stem cell subpopulation. Thus, the usage of agents controlling tumor extracellular acidosis might acquire great importance in the clinic for the treatment of aggressive solid tumor. Key messages • Extracellular acidosis up-regulates EMT and stem-related markers in melanoma cells • Acidic medium up-regulates in vitro self-renewal capacity of melanoma cells • Chronic acidosis adaptation induces trans-differentiation ability in melanoma cells • Melanoma cells adapted to acidosis show higher tumor-initiating potential than control cells • Extracellular acidosis promotes a stem-like phenotype in prostate and colorectal carcinoma cells

BackgroundBRAF inhibitor (BRAF-I) therapy for melanoma patients harboring the V600E mutation is initially highly effective, but almost all patients relapse within a few months. Understanding the molecular mechanisms behind BRAF-I responsiveness and acquired resistance is therefore an important issue. Here we assessed the role of urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) as a potentially valuable biomarker in the acquisition of BRAF-I resistance in V600E mutant melanoma cells.MethodsWe examined uPAR and EGFR levels by real time PCR and western blot analysis. uPAR loss of function was realized by knocking down uPAR by RNAi or using M25, a peptide that uncouples uPAR-integrin interaction. We investigated uPAR-β1integrin-EGFR association by co-immunoprecipitation and confocal immuno-fluorescence analysis. Acquired resistance to BRAF-I was generated by chronic exposure of cells to vemurafenib.FindingsWe proved that uPAR knockdown in combination with vemurafenib inhibits melanoma cell proliferation to greater extent than either treatment alone causing a decrease in AKT and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Conversely, we demonstrated that uPAR enforced over-expression results in reduced sensitivity to BRAF inhibition. Moreover, by targeting uPAR and EGFR interaction with an integrin antagonist peptide we restored vemurafenib responsiveness in melanoma resistant cells. Furthermore, we found significant detectable uPAR and EGFR levels in tumor biopsies of 4 relapsed patients.InterpretationWe disclosed an unpredicted mechanism of reduced sensitiveness to BRAF inhibition, driven by elevated levels of uPAR and identified a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome acquired resistance.FundsAssociazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC); Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze.

No abstract