BackgroundTo understand the particular evolutionary patterns of plant genomes, there is a need to systematically survey the fate of the subgenomes of polyploids fixed as whole genome duplicates, including patterns of retention of duplicate, triplicate, etc. genes.ResultsWe measure the simultaneous dynamics of duplicate orthologous gene loss in rosids, in asterids, and in monocots, as influenced by biological functional class. This pan-angiosperm view confirms common tendencies and consistency through time for both ancient and more recent whole genome polyploidization events.ConclusionsThe gene loss analysis represents an assessment of post-polyploidization evolution, at the level of individual gene families within and across sister genomes. Functional analysis confirms universal trends previously reported for more recent plant polyploidy events: genes involved with regulation and responses were retained in multiple copies, while genes involved with metabolic and catalytic processes tended to lose copies, across all three groups of plants.

BackgroundThe median of k≥3 genomes was originally defined to find a compromise genome indicative of a common ancestor. However, in gene order comparisons, the usual definitions based on minimizing the sum of distances to the input genomes lead to degenerate medians reflecting only one of the input genomes. “Near-medians”, consisting of equal samples of gene adjacencies from all the input genomes, were designed to restore the idea of compromise to the median problem.ResultWe explore adjacency sampling constructions in full generality in the case k=3, with given overlapping sets of adjacencies in the three genomes, where all adjacencies in two-way or three-way overlaps are included in the sample. We require the construction to be maximal, in the sense that no additional proportion of adjacencies from any of the genomes may be added without violating the local linearity of the genome. We discover that in incorporating as many adjacencies as possible, evenly from all the input genomes, we are actually maximizing, rather than minimizing, the sum of distances over all other maximal sampling schemes.ConclusionsWe propose to explore compromise instead of parsimony as the organizing principle for the small phylogeny problem.