Protein-based biological drugs and many industrial enzymes are unstable, making them prohibitively expensive. Some can be stabilized by formulation with excipients, but most still require low temperature storage. In search of new, more robust excipients, we turned to the tardigrade, a microscopic animal that synthesizes cytosolic abundant heat soluble (CAHS) proteins to protect its cellular components during desiccation. We find that CAHS proteins protect the test enzymes lactate dehydrogenase and lipoprotein lipase against desiccation-, freezing-, and lyophilization-induced deactivation. Our data also show that a variety of globular and disordered protein controls, with no known link to desiccation tolerance, protect our test enzymes. Protection of lactate dehydrogenase correlates, albeit imperfectly, with the charge density of the protein additive, suggesting an approach to tune protection by modifying charge. Our results support the potential use of CAHS proteins as stabilizing excipients in formulations and suggest that other proteins may have similar potential.

Many organisms can adapt to changes in the solute content of their surroundings (i.e., the osmolarity). Hyperosmotic shock causes water efflux and a concomitant reduction in cell volume, which is countered by the accumulation of osmolytes. This volume reduction increases the crowded nature of the cytoplasm, which is expected to affect protein stability. In contrast to traditional theory, which predicts that more crowded conditions can only increase protein stability, recent work shows that crowding can destabilize proteins through transient attractive interactions. Here, we quantify protein stability in living Escherichia coli cells before and after hyperosmotic shock in the presence and absence of the osmolyte, glycine betaine. The 7-kDa N-terminal src-homology 3 domain of Drosophila signal transduction protein drk is used as the test protein. We find that hyperosmotic shock decreases SH3 stability in cells, consistent with the idea that transient attractive interactions are important under physiologically relevant crowded conditions. The subsequent uptake of glycine betaine returns SH3 to the stability observed without osmotic shock. These results highlight the effect of transient attractive interactions on protein stability in cells and provide a new explanation for why stressed cells accumulate osmolytes.

Protein−protein interactions are usually studied in dilute buffered solutions with macromolecule concentrations of <10 g/L. In cells, however, the macromolecule concentration can exceed 300 g/L, resulting in nonspecific interactions between macromolecules. These interactions can be divided into hard-core steric repulsions and "soft" chemical interactions. Here, we test a hypothesis from scaled particle theory; the influence of hard-core repulsions on a protein dimer depends on its shape. We tested the idea using a side-by-side dumbbell-shaped dimer and a domain-swapped ellipsoidal dimer. Both dimers are variants of the B1 domain of protein G and differ by only three residues. The results from the relatively inert synthetic polymer crowding molecules, Ficoll and PEG, support the hypothesis, indicating that the domain-swapped dimer is stabilized by hard-core repulsions while the side-by-side dimer shows little to no stabilization. We also show that protein cosolutes, which interact primarily through nonspecific chemical interactions, have the same small effect on both dimers. Our results suggest that the shape of the protein dimer determines the influence of hard-core repulsions, providing cells with a mechanism for regulating protein−protein interactions. macromolecular crowding | protein−protein interactions | scaled particle theory P rotein−protein interactions are essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis (1). Details of their equilibria under thermodynamically ideal conditions have provided a trove of information. Ideality in this sense refers to dilute solutions, where each monomer contacts only solvent or another monomer, conditions far removed from those in cells where protein− protein interactions evolved. In the cytoplasm, and other cellular compartments and biological fluids, macromolecules can occupy up to 30% of the volume, and their concentrations often exceed 300 g/L (2).Protein molecules take part in more-complex interactions under nonideal conditions. The surrounding macromolecules influence proteins in two ways, neither of which is significant in dilute solution. Hard-core repulsions arise from high volume occupancy, because two molecules cannot occupy the same space at the same time. This volume exclusion favors the most compact state of a protein (3). Chemical interactions comprise transient contacts between protein surfaces arising from the diverse chemical landscapes of proteins (4). When repulsive (i.e., like charges), they favor the state that maximizes the distance between charges, adding to the hard-core repulsions and stabilizing the native state. Attractive chemical interactions (e.g., opposite charges, hydrogen bonds) are destabilizing. We are beginning to understand how hard-core repulsions and chemical interactions affect protein stability (5), but there are few studies about crowding effects on protein−protein interactions (6-9).Given the existential roles of both protein−protein interactions and crowding in biology (10), we are undertaking efforts to determine the effect of cro...

Protein–protein interactions are essential for life but rarely thermodynamically quantified in living cells. In vitro efforts show that protein complex stability is modulated by high concentrations of cosolutes, including synthetic polymers, proteins, and cell lysates via a combination of hard-core repulsions and chemical interactions. We quantified the stability of a model protein complex, the A34F GB1 homodimer, in buffer, Escherichia coli cells and Xenopus laevis oocytes. The complex is more stable in cells than in buffer and more stable in oocytes than E. coli. Studies of several variants show that increasing the negative charge on the homodimer surface increases stability in cells. These data, taken together with the fact that oocytes are less crowded than E. coli cells, lead to the conclusion that chemical interactions are more important than hard-core repulsions under physiological conditions, a conclusion also gleaned from studies of protein stability in cells. Our studies have implications for understanding how promiscuous—and specific—interactions coherently evolve for a protein to properly function in the crowded cellular environment.

NMR spectroscopy can provide information about proteins in living cells. pH is an important characteristic of the intracellular environment because it modulates key protein properties such as net charge and stability. Here, we show that pH modulates quinary interactions, the weak, ubiquitous interactions between proteins and other cellular macromolecules. We use the K10H variant of the B domain of protein G (GB1, 6.2 kDa) as a pH reporter in Escherichia coli cells. By controlling the intracellular pH, we show that quinary interactions influence the quality of in-cell 15 N-1 H HSQC NMR spectra. At low pH, the quality is degraded because the increase in attractive interactions between E. coli proteins and GB1 slows GB1 tumbling and broadens its crosspeaks. The results demonstrate the importance of quinary interactions for furthering our understanding of protein chemistry in living cells.