TBM was more likely to occur in younger patients, with a larger clinical mass at presentation. Histologically, TBM tends to show more eosinophils and necrosis, and IGM is associated with more plasma cells. The characteristics of the granulomas and giant cells were not distinguishing features.

Cytokeratin (CK) immunohistochemistry can play an important role in breast carcinoma evaluation. We evaluated the expression of a panel of commonly used CKs in a large cohort of breast cancers and assessed its correlation with other biomarkers and breast cancer subtypes. Expression of CK7, CK8, CK18 and CK19 was observed in more than 90 % of all breast carcinomas in this study, confirming their efficacy in immunohistochemical identification of breast cancer. A combination of CK8 and CK7 gave the highest sensitivity for detection of a minute number of breast cancer cells. Expression of other CKs, including CK5/6, CK14 and CK20, correlated positively with high tumour grade. The expression of CK5/6 and CK14 in a significant number of high-grade tumours raised concern regarding the use of absence of their expression to identify breast carcinoma. For identification of the basal subtype, CK5/6 gave a higher detection rate than CK14. CK20 expression was found more frequently than reported in previous studies, might constitute an indicator of poor prognosis and may be associated with the molecular apocrine subtype. This study highlights the diagnostic and prognostic relevance of the unique CK expression patterns in breast cancer.

Cumulative evidence has demonstrated the presence of cancer stem cells (CSC) in breast cancer and its putative role in cancer progression. Nonetheless, the clinical significance of CSC in breast cancer remains elusive. The underlying reasons could be due to the heterogeneity of breast cancer subtypes as well as different markers used to define breast CSC. In this study, three widely used markers (aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)1+ and CD24-CD44+) were used to define two populations of CSC in a large cohort of breast cancers. The expressions of these markers were correlated with different clinicopathological features and the molecular subtypes. ALDH1+ breast cancers were associated with basal-like and HER2-overexpressing subtypes and the characteristics histologic features were related to these two subtypes. On the other hand, CD24-CD44+ breast cancers were associated positively with the presence of extensive in situ component, the absence of lymph node involvement, and basal markers, but negatively with HER2. CD24-CD44+ breast cancers were also positively associated with luminal B cancers. As the expression of CSC markers varied among different molecular subtypes and different clinicopathological features, it appeared that each CSC population could have distinct clinical values in different subgroups of breast cancers. For improved prognostication with CSC, combining the analysis of CSC markers would be required. Within the luminal cancers, CSC appeared to identify cancers with poor outcome. The presence of CSC populations was associated with ER-PR+ cancers and tumors expressing basal markers. Basal marker expression can complement with CSC for improved indicator for poor prognosis in luminal breast cancers. For the first time, the possible contribution of CSC to these aggressive luminal cancers was demonstrated. The association of basal features and CSC in luminal cancers also raised the possibility that luminal cancer cells may acquire basal phenotype and CSC properties together during their progression.

Cytological diagnosis of papillary lesions shows a significant error rate with overlapping features. Cellular atypia and fragments with long and slender papillae with ramifying edges favour papillary carcinoma.