BackgroundLarge arachnoid granulations that protrude into dural venous sinuses and partially obstruct outflow are an underappreciated etiology of pulsatile tinnitus (PT). Endovascular dural venous sinus stenting is thought to diminish turbulent venous outflow and may relieve obstruction caused by arachnoid granulations.MethodsFour patients at two institutions were evaluated for unilateral PT. Magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography revealed moderate-to-severe stenoses from large arachnoid granulations within the implicated transverse sinus. All patients underwent venous manometry and endovascular sinus stenting.ResultsAll patients experienced immediate and complete remission of their PT. Stenoses were relieved by a mean of 93% by Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease criteria. There were no procedural or periprocedural complications. All patients continued to report complete symptom resolution at a mean of 8-month follow-up.ConclusionsPT from arachnoid granulations are an underappreciated pathomechanism. Endovascular dural venous sinus stenting is an effective intervention for treating unilateral PT secondary to large arachnoid granulation.
BACKGROUND
Patients with symptomatic high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) associated with a free-floating thrombus (FFT) present a significant clinical challenge. In general, for patients with moderate to severe symptomatic ICA stenosis, carotid revascularization is recommended within 2 weeks of symptom onset; however, some physicians suggest that revascularization should be delayed in cases with FFT because some data suggest that early surgery with carotid endarterectomy or carotid stent poses a higher risk for stroke. Likewise, delayed revascularization with anticoagulation may increase risk of recurrent stroke. Few reports on the management of FTT included the use of a transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) approach for carotid revascularization with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy.
OBSERVATIONS
This report described the use of TCAR for direct mechanical thrombectomy and carotid stent placement for a patient with 80% right ICA stenosis along with a large FFT extending into the bulb and the external carotid artery.
LESSONS
The TCAR approach for mechanical thrombectomy and carotid stenting is a safe alternative for early revascularization with low periprocedural stroke risks.
Background The optimal approach to the management of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) at the time of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains controversial. The goal of this study is to characterize current practices concerning this challenging clinical situation in a survey of practicing neurointerventionalists. Methods An electronic questionnaire was sent to a cross-section of North American academic neurointerventionalists using publicly available contact information and departmental websites. Prior to analysis, responses were anonymized and categorized by region. Results A total of 136/360 responses were recorded from the U.S. and Canada. The mean number of years of practicing as a neurointerventionalist among the respondents was 10.5 (± 6.2 years). ICAD was perceived as a causative factor during MT for LVO in 5–10% of thrombectomy cases. The most common first-line treatment approach for significant ICAD, assuming a TICI 2b or better reperfusion, was medical therapy (77.9% of respondents), followed by angioplasty + stent placement (8.8% of respondents). There were no significant differences in the first line treatment of ICAD in LVO between geographical regions (p = 0.815). Conclusion The approach to underlying ICAD in LVO varies widely; however, the majority of neurointerventionalists prefer medical therapy with DAPT as a first-line treatment approach. The current survey highlights the need for studies that better define the optimal timing and modality of treatment, along with an evidence-based framework for balancing the risks associated with these treatment approaches.
BACKGROUND: Manipulation of the pituitary stalk, posterior pituitary gland, and hypothalamus during transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection can cause disruption of water electrolyte regulation leading to diabetes insipidus (DI). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pituitary stalk stretch is an independent risk factor for postoperative DI after pituitary adenoma resection. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection of pituitary macroadenoma between July 2010 and December 2016 by a single neurosurgeon. We analyzed preoperative and postoperative imaging metrics to assess predictors for postoperative DI. RESULTS: Of the 234 patients undergoing resection, 41 (17.5%) developed postoperative DI. DI was permanent in 10 (4.3%) and transient in 31 (13.2%). The pituitary stalk stretch, measured as the change in stalk length from preoperative to postoperative imaging, was greater in the DI compared with the non-DI group (10.1 mm vs 5.9 mm, P < .0001). The pituitary stalk stretch was associated with DI with significant difference in mean pituitary stalk stretch between non-DI group vs DI group (5.9 mm vs 10.1 mm, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that pituitary stalk stretch >10 mm was a significant independent predictor of postoperative DI [odds ratios = 2.56 (1.10-5.96), P = .029]. When stratified into transient and permanent DI, multivariable analysis showed that pituitary stalk stretch >10 mm was a significant independent predictor of transient DI [odds ratios = 2.71 (1.0-7.1), P = .046] but not permanent DI. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pituitary stalk stretch after transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery is an important factor for postoperative DI. We propose a reconstruction strategy to mitigate stalk stretch.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.