HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven efficacy in reducing the risk of HIV infection in men who have sex with men (MSM), but has not yet been commissioned in the UK. The aim of this study was to investigate perceived need and benefit (or experience of) PrEP among HIV-negative MSM attending sexual health clinics. HIV-negative MSM attending three sexual health centres in London, UK were opportunistically invited to complete a questionnaire. Data collected comprised demographic data and sexual and drug use behaviours as well as questions regarding perceptions of risk and need for PrEP. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify variables predicting acceptability of, and intention to use, PrEP. In addition, data were gathered in respondents already taking PrEP. Eight hundred and thirty-nine questionnaires were analysed. The median age of respondents was 35 years (IQR 28-41, range 18-78), 650 (77%) were of white ethnicity and 649 (77%) had a university education. Four hundred and fifty-six (54%) reported at least one episode of condomless anal sex in the preceding three months, 437 (52%) reported recreational drug use in the preceding three months and 311 (37%) had been diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection within the preceding six months. Four hundred and sixty-three (64%) of 726 strongly agreed with the statement 'I think I would benefit from PrEP'. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that having receptive anal intercourse (RAI) without condoms, having an awareness of the risk of unprotected RAI and having belief in the effectiveness of PrEP were independent predictors for someone thinking they would benefit from taking PrEP. Eight percent of respondents (59/724) had already taken or were currently taking PrEP. The results suggest that individuals at risk are likely to perceive themselves as benefiting from PrEP. The majority perceived their risk of acquiring HIV and benefit from PrEP accurately. Overall they appeared to have little concern over the use of PrEP and generally positive attitudes. Further investigation is warranted to understand why those at risk do not perceive benefit from PrEP.

Reference strains of HIV-1 from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, including wild-type IIIB, G762-3, and AZT resistant with RT 215T-->Y (G910-11/AZT); 67D-->N, 70K-->R, 215T-->F, 219K-->Q (G691-2/AZT); as well as nevirapine (NEV) resistant with 181Y-->C (N119/NEV); and 103K-->N, 181Y-->C (A17/NEV), were subjected to quantitative parametric efficacy analysis using AZT, stavudine (D4T), and nevirapine (NEV) singly or in combinations in MT4 or MT2 cells. The median-effect principle and combination index (CI) method of Chou-Talalay (see Ref. 26) have been used, which take into account both the potency (Dm value or EC50) and the shape of the dose-effect curve (m value). Under standardized assay conditions, G910-11 and G691-2 strains showed 600- and 7800-fold resistance to AZT, and N119 and A17 strains showed 3600- and 1000-fold resistance to NEV at the EC50 level, respectively. AZT-resistant strains exhibited slight cross-resistance to D4T. Computerized analysis indicates that IIIB gave sigmoidal dose-effect curves (m = 2.8, 3.4, and 3.1 for AZT, D4T, and NEV, respectively) whereas drug-resistant strains showed negative sigmoidicity toward the corresponding AZT or NEV, with m = 0.27-0.73. Therefore, the degrees of drug resistance are drastically different at classic EC50 and at therapeutically more relevant EC95 levels (ranging from severalfold to several log orders). Combinations of AZT+NEV and AZT+NEV+D4T showed synergism against IIIB, G762-3 (wild type) and A17/NEV, G910-11/AZT strains. D4T+NEV and AZT+D4T showed nearly additive or moderate antagonism. Synergism or additive effect leads to a favorable dose-reduction index (DRI). The present study on RT inhibitors provides quantitative assessment of the combinations of AZT, NEV, and D4T against HIV infections involving drug-sensitive and drug-resistant HIVs.