Acquired brain injury (ABI) entails any injury that disrupts neuronal activity and is not degenerative, hereditary, congenital, or induced by birth trauma. Traditional examples of ABI include not only stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI), but also near drowning, aneurysm, tumor, meningitis and other infections involving the brain, and injuries resulting from lack of oxygen supply to the brain, such as those seen in myocardial infarction. ABI may involve a structural insult, changes to metabolic activity, or disruption to neuronal capabilities.While progressive loss of brain cells and debilitating motor and cognitive deficits play a role in all these disorders, stroke and TBI overlap particularly closely in pathology and impose an immense burden on the American and global populations. AbstractIschemic stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) comprise two particularly prevalent and costly examples of acquired brain injury (ABI). Following stroke or TBI, primary cell death and secondary cell death closely model disease progression and worsen outcomes. Mounting evidence indicates that long-term neuroinflammation extensively exacerbates the secondary deterioration of brain structure and function. Due to their immunomodulatory and regenerative properties, mesenchymal stem cell transplants have emerged as a promising approach to treating this facet of stroke and TBI pathology. In this review, we summarize the classification of cell death in ABI and discuss the prominent role of inflammation. We then consider the efficacy of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (BM-MSC) transplantation as a therapy for these injuries. Finally, we examine recent laboratory and clinical studies utilizing transplanted BM-MSCs as antiinflammatory and neurorestorative treatments for stroke and TBI. Clinical trials of BM-MSC transplants for stroke and TBI support their promising protective and regenerative properties. Future research is needed to allow for better comparison among trials and to elaborate on the emerging area of cell-based combination treatments. K E Y W O R D Sbone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, clinical trials, inflammation, ischemic stroke, preclinical studies, traumatic brain injury
Stem cell transplantation with rehabilitation therapy presents an effective stroke treatment. Here, we discuss current breakthroughs in stem cell research along with rehabilitation strategies that may have a synergistic outcome when combined together after stroke. Indeed, stem cell transplantation offers a promising new approach and may add to current rehabilitation therapies. By reviewing the pathophysiology of stroke and the mechanisms by which stem cells and rehabilitation attenuate this inflammatory process, we hypothesize that a combined therapy will provide better functional outcomes for patients. Using current preclinical data, we explore the prominent types of stem cells, the existing theories for stem cell repair, rehabilitation treatments inside the brain, rehabilitation modalities outside the brain, and evidence pertaining to the benefits of combined therapy. In this review article, we assess the advantages and disadvantages of using stem cell transplantation with rehabilitation to mitigate the devastating effects of stroke.
Stroke remains a significant unmet need in the clinic with few therapeutic options. We, and others, have implicated the role of inflammatory microbiota in stroke secondary cell death. Elucidating this inflammation microbiome as a biomarker may improve stroke diagnosis and treatment. Here, adult Sprague-Dawley rats performed 30 minutes of exercise on a motorized treadmill for 3 consecutive days prior to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Stroke animals that underwent exercise showed 1) robust behavioral improvements, 2) significantly smaller infarct sizes and increased peri-infarct cell survival and 3) decreasing trends of inflammatory microbiota BAC303, EREC482, and LAB158 coupled with significantly reduced levels of inflammatory markers ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and mouse monoclonal MHC Class II RT1B in the brain, gut, spleen, and thymus compared to non-exercised stroke rats. These results suggest that a specific set of inflammatory microbiota exists in central and peripheral organs and can serve as a disease biomarker and a therapeutic target for stroke.
Stem cell therapy may present an effective treatment for metastatic brain cancer and glioblastoma. Here we posit the critical role of a leaky blood-brain barrier (BBB) as a key element for the development of brain metastases, specifically melanoma. By reviewing the immunological and inflammatory responses associated with BBB damage secondary to tumoral activity, we identify the involvement of this pathological process in the growth and formation of metastatic brain cancers. Likewise, we evaluate the hypothesis of regenerating impaired endothelial cells of the BBB and alleviating the damaged neurovascular unit to attenuate brain metastasis, using the endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) phenotype of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Specifically, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy for stem cell therapy to repair disruptions in the BBB and reduce inflammation in the brain, thereby causing attenuation of metastatic brain cancers. To establish the viability of stem cell therapy for the prevention and treatment of metastatic brain tumors, it is crucial to demonstrate BBB repair through augmentation of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. BBB disruption is strongly linked to metastatic melanoma, worsens neuroinflammation during metastasis, and negatively influences the prognosis of metastatic brain cancer. Using stem cell therapy to interrupt inflammation secondary to this leaky BBB represents a paradigm-shifting approach for brain cancer treatment. In this review article, we critically assess the advantages and disadvantages of using stem cell therapy for brain metastases and glioblastoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.