Background: Defining regulatory mechanisms through which noncoding risk variants influence the cell-mediated pathogenesis of immune-mediated disease (IMD) has emerged as a priority in the post-genome-wide association study era. Objectives: With a focus on rheumatoid arthritis, we sought new insight into genetic mechanisms of adaptive immune dysregulation to help prioritize molecular pathways for targeting in this and related immune pathologies.
ObjectiveRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a genetically complex disease of immune dysregulation. This study sought to gain further insight into the genetic risk mechanisms of RA by conducting an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis of confirmed genetic risk loci in CD4+ T cells and B cells from carefully phenotyped patients with early arthritis who were naive to therapeutic immunomodulation.Methods RNA and DNA were isolated from purified B and/or CD4+ T cells obtained from the peripheral blood of 344 patients with early arthritis. Genotyping and global gene expression measurements were carried out using Illumina BeadChip microarrays. Variants in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with non‐HLA RA single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (defined as r2 ≥ 0.8) were analyzed, seeking evidence of cis‐ or trans‐eQTLs according to whether the associated probes were or were not within 4 Mb of these LD blocks.ResultsGenes subject to cis‐eQTL effects that were common to both CD4+ and B lymphocytes at RA risk loci were FADS1,FADS2,BLK,FCRL3,ORMDL3,PPIL3, and GSDMB. In contrast, those acting on METTL21B,JAZF1,IKZF3, and PADI4 were unique to CD4+ lymphocytes, with the latter candidate risk gene being identified for the first time in this cell subset. B lymphocyte–specific eQTLs for SYNGR1 and CD83 were also found. At the 8p23 BLK–FAM167A locus, adjacent genes were subject to eQTLs whose activity differed markedly between cell types; in particular, the FAM167A effect displayed striking B lymphocyte specificity. No trans‐eQTLs approached experiment‐wide significance, and linear modeling did not identify a significant influence of biologic covariates on cis‐eQTL effect sizes.ConclusionThese findings further refine the understanding of candidate causal genes in RA pathogenesis, thus providing an important platform from which downstream functional studies, directed toward particular cell types, may be prioritized.
Bayesian networks can be used to identify possible causal relationships between variables based on their conditional dependencies and independencies, which can be particularly useful in complex biological scenarios with many measured variables. Here we propose two improvements to an existing method for Bayesian network analysis, designed to increase the power to detect potential causal relationships between variables (including potentially a mixture of both discrete and continuous variables). Our first improvement relates to the treatment of missing data. When there is missing data, the standard approach is to remove every individual with any missing data before performing analysis. This can be wasteful and undesirable when there are many individuals with missing data, perhaps with only one or a few variables missing. This motivates the use of imputation. We present a new imputation method that uses a version of nearest neighbour imputation, whereby missing data from one individual is replaced with data from another individual, their nearest neighbour. For each individual with missing data, the subsets of variables to be used to select the nearest neighbour are chosen by sampling without replacement the complete data and estimating a best fit Bayesian network. We show that this approach leads to marked improvements in the recall and precision of directed edges in the final network identified, and we illustrate the approach through application to data from a recent study investigating the causal relationship between methylation and gene expression in early inflammatory arthritis patients. We also describe a second improvement in the form of a pseudo-Bayesian approach for upweighting certain network edges, which can be useful when there is prior evidence concerning their directions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.