Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous group of diseases that, although unified by a number of characteristics, require a differential thera- peutic approach. Current review discusses key pathogenic features of type 2 diabetes mellitus that determine therapy goals and options in management. We further enunciate and pathogenetically substantiate a new "gravicentric" concept for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus that differs in many ways from the common contemporary approach.

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a well-known efficacy predictor for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies. Currently, TMB assessment relies on DNA sequencing data. Gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) is another type of analysis that can inform clinical decision-making and including TMB estimation may strongly benefit this approach, especially for the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Here, we for the first time compared TMB levels deduced from whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNAseq profiles of the same FFPE biosamples in single-sample mode. We took TCGA project data with mean sequencing depth 23 million gene-mapped reads (MGMRs) and found 0.46 (Pearson)–0.59 (Spearman) correlation with standard mutation calling pipelines. This was converted into low (<10) and high (>10) TMB per megabase classifier with area under the curve (AUC) 0.757, and application of machine learning increased AUC till 0.854. We then compared 73 experimental pairs of WES and RNAseq profiles with lower (mean 11 MGMRs) and higher (mean 68 MGMRs) RNA sequencing depths. For higher depth, we observed ~1 AUC for the high/low TMB classifier and 0.85 (Pearson)–0.95 (Spearman) correlation with standard mutation calling pipelines. For the lower depth, the AUC was below the high-quality threshold of 0.7. Thus, we conclude that using RNA sequencing of tumor materials from FFPE blocks with enough coverage can afford for high-quality discrimination of tumors with high and low TMB levels in a single-sample mode.

No abstract

In this short letter, we comment on the major points of the response to our previous paper. In particular, we provide further clarification of our position on the issue of bariatric surgery, on principal pharmacological approaches to the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and on the cause-effect interplay between obesity and development of type 2 diabetes.