Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare distinct subtype of aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and a notoriously hard to treat entity with a dismal prognosis in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive patients. Clinicians often face the question of second or third line treatment. As the treatment options with novel agents in lymphomas are rapidly evolving, more and more options beyond standard chemotherapy are available. In connection with a review of treatment options with novel lymphoma agents, we present a case report of a patient with a complete remission after the administration of brentuximab vedotin and lenalidomide.

In the context of 2 patients with hematological malignancy who developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), we review the current therapeutic options for this serious complication. Both patients had lymphoma and had been pretreated with the antibody rituximab. Diagnosis of PML was obtained upon the detection of the JC virus. The outcome was fatal in both cases. So far, no standard therapeutic approach for JC virus infection has been established in HIV-negative patients with hematological malignancies and the outcome is usually fatal. Serotonin receptor antagonists might have a beneficial effect by blocking the virus from entering the cells. Although hopes for the efficacy of mefloquine were disappointed by the results of 1 study, several case reports describe improvements in neurological impairment when this drug is administered. Taking the desperate situation of this patient group into consideration, the combination of mirtazapine and mefloquine might be worthy of an attempt.

e23559 Background: Radiation therapy is an essential backbone of the management of patients (pts.) with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) as part of a multimodal curative or palliative treatment. Concurrent external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy with doxorubicin (doxo) and ifosfamide (ifo) may be indicated as well, but is associated with relevant toxicity. Gemcitabine (gem) is a known radiosensitizer and has shown activity in STS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent EBRT and gemcitabine. Methods: A single center, retrospective analysis of 12 patients (pts) with STS treated with concurrent EBRT and gemcitabine from Nov 2017 to Dez 2019 in a neoadjuvant (6 pts) or palliative setting (6 pts). Gemcitabine (gem) was administered with 150-300mg/m2 once weekly for the duration of the EBRT (50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks). In the neoadjuvant treated group, 4 pts had undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) G3, 1 leiomyosarcoma (LMS) G2 and 1 retroperitoneal G1 liposarcoma (LPS). The pts. were either not eligible for a neoadjuvant systemic treatment with doxo/ifo or received the EBRT/gem treatment in addition to it. Results: 5/6 pts. with neoadjuvant EBRT/gem had R0 resection and 1/6pt. R1. The IUCC stage was IIIB in 5/6 pts and IB in 1/6 pt. The tumor regression grade (TRG) was > 99% in 3/4 pts. with UPS G3 (75%) and 80% in 1/4 pt. with UPS G3. The TRG for the G2 LMS and for the G1 LPS was 20%. All pts treated in palliative setting had high grade sarcoma and responded to the treatment with partial remission, the 6 months’ local control rate was 83% (5/6 pts) for symptomatic fast growing lesions, 1/6 pt. being in PR at 4 months follow up. The combination treatment was well tolerated with reversible skin toxicity CTCAE grade I. As expected transient thrombocytopenia was observed without limiting effect on the planned EBRT. Conclusions: The combination therapy of EBRT and gemcitabine as sensitizer in pts. with STS is feasible und well tolerated. The treatment is an option for patients not eligible for neoadjuvant systemic treatment with doxo/ifo and in the palliative setting as well. It might be more potent than radiation only in achieving tumor regression and local control for high grade STS.

Medulloblastoma is a common primary brain tumor in children but it is a rare cancer in adult patients. We reviewed the literature, searching PubMed for articles on this rare tumor entity, with a focus on tumor biology, advanced neurosurgical opportunities for safe tumor resection, and multimodal treatment options. Adult medulloblastoma occurs at a rate of 0.6 per one million people per year. There is a slight disparity between male and female patients, and patients with a fair skin tone are more likely to have a medulloblastoma. Patients present with cerebellar signs and signs of elevated intracranial pressure. Diagnostic efforts should consist of cerebral MRI and MRI of the spinal axis. Cerebrospinal fluid should be investigated to look for tumor dissemination. Medulloblastoma tumors can be classified as classic, desmoplastic, anaplastic, and large cell, according to the WHO tumor classification. Molecular subgroups include WNT, SHH, group 3, and group 4 tumors. Further molecular analyses suggest that there are several subgroups within the four existing subgroups, with significant differences in patient age, frequency of metastatic spread, and patient survival. As molecular markers have started to play an increasing role in determining treatment strategies and prognosis, their importance has increased rapidly. Treatment options include microsurgical tumor resection and radiotherapy and, in addition, chemotherapy that respects the tumor biology of individual patients offers targeted therapeutic approaches. For neurosurgeons, intraoperative imaging and tumor fluorescence may improve resection rates. Disseminated disease, residual tumor after surgery, lower radiation dose, and low Karnofsky performance status are all suggestive of a poor outcome. Extraneural spread occurs only in very few cases. The reported 5-year-survival rates range between 60% and 80% for all adult medulloblastoma patients.