In the long-term course of severe mental disorders (SZ/SA), changes in the psychosocial factors are stronger predictors of subjective quality of life outcome than disorder-related changes. The findings enable better understanding of the combined effects of psychopathology and psychosocial factors on quality of life outcome over a 10-year period.
The aim of the current study was to investigate an association of physical and social hedonic deficits with health-related quality of life (HRQL), controlling for related distressing and protective factors. Eighty-seven stable patients with schizophrenia (SZ) and schizoaffective disorder (SA) were assessed using the revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (PAS) and the Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS), the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), and related factors. Hedonic and HRQL deficit scores did not reach significant differences between SZ and SA patients. General and domain-specific Q-LES-Q scores were significantly correlated with PAS and SAS scores independent of the adverse effects and psychopathological symptoms. Dissatisfaction with HRQL increased from "normal hedonics" (4.8%) to "hypohedonics" (28.6%) and "double anhedonics" (66.7%). Permanently dissatisfied patients who revealed deterioration in general quality of life across 10 years had significantly higher PAS and SAS scores than did patients who were permanently satisfied and improved. An exploratory factor analysis yielded a three-factor solution; PAS and SAS scores were joined to the second factor together with Q-LES-Q, self-efficacy, coping styles, and social support scores. PAS scores accounted for 7% to 13% of the total variance in three domains and in the general quality-of-life alterations. SAS scores did not predict variability in the Q-LES-Q domains. Therefore, physical and social hedonic deficits significantly associated with poor HRQL independent of the adverse effects and psychopathological symptoms of SZ/SA. Physical anhedonia may be a predictor for quality-of-life deficit.
Long-term quality of life outcomes are characterized by four different types that fit changes over time in emotional distress, side effects, somatization, symptom dimensions, and general functioning scores. Revealed predictors are factors that can be ameliorated and thereby enhance satisfaction with quality of life over time.
Aim: To investigate the factor structure underlying the Camberwell Assessment of Need-Patient Version (CANSAS-P) items in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.Method: Factor, correlation and regression analyses were performed for dimensions of CANSAS-P, illness, personality and quality of life (QOL) related variables in 95 stabilized patients with chronic schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a fourfactor model that explains 50.4% of the total variance of the 20 CANSAS-P items. The factors 'Social disability', 'Information processing disability', 'Emotional processing disability', and 'Coping disability' showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's a coefficient 0.67-0.77). The CANSAS-P subscale scores positively correlated with severity of symptoms, distress (r ranged from 0.34 to 0.45), while negatively associated with general functioning (r = -0.34), friend (r = -0.46) and family support (r = -0.41), satisfaction with medicine (r = -0.35), general activities (r = -0.40), and general QOL (r = -0.35) (all P < 0.001). Severity of illness, symptoms, emotional distress and emotion-oriented coping were positive predictors; friend support, QOL general activities, life satisfaction and satisfaction with medicine were negative predictors of the CANSAS-P subscale scores. The effect size (f 2 ) for these predictors ranged from medium to quite large (f 2 = 0.28-1.13), and they explain from 23% to 46% of the variability in CANSAS-P subscales.Conclusions: A four-factor structure mode, including social and cognitive functioning, emotion responsivity and coping with daily challenges, appears to fit CANSAS-P items. These subscales may contribute to research and improve treatment of psychiatric patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.