No abstract

Introduction The most common cause of failure in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is aseptic loosening. Uncemented cup migration analysis by EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse) has shown to be a good predictive indicator for early implant failure if the cup migrates more than 1 milimeter (mm) within the first 2 years after surgery. In this study, we investigated the migration behaviour of an uncemented press-fit cup after 2 years follow-up. Materials and methods Applying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who received an uncemented press-fit cup at our Department between 2013 and 2018. A total of 484 patients were identified. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-Cup software. EBRA measurements and statistical investigations were performed by two independent investigators. Results A total of 165 cups in 159 patients (female: 90; male: 69) met our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 66.7 (range 18.4–90.5) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a mean total migration of 0.7 mm (range 0.0–6.3) over our follow-up period of 2 years. Of the investigated cups, 53.2% showed less than 1 mm migration in the investigated follow-up period. Conclusion In conclusion, the Pinnacle cup used in our study provides low mean migration at final follow-up. Based on the assumption of secondary stabilization, good long-term outcome of the Pinnacle cup can be expected. Trial registration number and date of registration Number: 20181024-1875; Date: 2018-09-20

Objective To investigate the clinical outcome of patients that underwent conversion of a medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to compare that outcome to patients that underwent primary TKA. It was hypothesized that those groups would significantly differ in terms of knee score outcome and implant survival. Methods A retrospective-comparative study was conducted utilizing data from the Federal state’s arthroplasty registry. Included were patients from our department that undergone a conversion of a medial UKA to a TKA (UKA-TKA group). The Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) from preoperative and 1-year postoperative was used. Moreover, the implant survival was analyzed. Results In the UKA-TKA group, there were 51 cases (age 67 ± 10, 74% women), and in the TKA group, there were 2247 cases (age 69 ± 9, 66% women). The one-year postoperative WOMAC total score was 33 in the UKA-TKA group und 21 in the TKA group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, and WOMAC function scores were significantly worse in the UKA-TKA. After 5 years, the survival rates were 82% and 95% (p = 0.001). The 10-years prosthesis survival was 74% and 91% in the UKA-TKA and TKA groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions Based on our findings it is concluded that patients who received a TKA after UKA have inferior results than those that directly receive a TKA. This is true for both patient-reported knee outcome and prosthesis survival. Converting UKA to TKA should not be seen as an easy operation, but should rather be done by surgeons with considerable experience in both primary and revision knee arthroplasty.