BackgroundRhodobacter sphaeroides is one of the best studied purple non-sulfur photosynthetic bacteria and serves as an excellent model for the study of photosynthesis and the metabolic capabilities of this and related facultative organisms. The ability of R. sphaeroides to produce hydrogen (H2), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) or other hydrocarbons, as well as its ability to utilize atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) as a carbon source under defined conditions, make it an excellent candidate for use in a wide variety of biotechnological applications. A genome-level understanding of its metabolic capabilities should help realize this biotechnological potential.ResultsHere we present a genome-scale metabolic network model for R. sphaeroides strain 2.4.1, designated iRsp1095, consisting of 1,095 genes, 796 metabolites and 1158 reactions, including R. sphaeroides-specific biomass reactions developed in this study. Constraint-based analysis showed that iRsp1095 agreed well with experimental observations when modeling growth under respiratory and phototrophic conditions. Genes essential for phototrophic growth were predicted by single gene deletion analysis. During pathway-level analyses of R. sphaeroides metabolism, an alternative route for CO2 assimilation was identified. Evaluation of photoheterotrophic H2 production using iRsp1095 indicated that maximal yield would be obtained from growing cells, with this predicted maximum ~50% higher than that observed experimentally from wild type cells. Competing pathways that might prevent the achievement of this theoretical maximum were identified to guide future genetic studies.ConclusionsiRsp1095 provides a robust framework for future metabolic engineering efforts to optimize the solar- and nutrient-powered production of biofuels and other valuable products by R. sphaeroides and closely related organisms.
Existing studies investigating the elemental composition of membrane foulant layers typically use one of the following analytical techniques: energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), or Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). However, given that EDS, XPS, and RBS have different capabilities, limitations, and depths of analysis, these techniques may provide differing results from each other. Thus, to understand the suitability of each technique for the analysis of membrane foulant layers, a thorough study is needed that compares EDS, XPS, and RBS results for a diverse set of fouled membranes. As such, the objectives of this study were to identify the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of EDS, XPS and RBS in the characterization of the elemental composition of foulant layers, and evaluate whether the three techniques yield consistent and/or complementary results for sample composition and structure. We studied four diverse fouled membranes, each before and after cleaning, as well as the original unfouled membranes, and assessed the suitability of each technique for various applications, such as the detection of major elements in thick and thin layers, characterization of sample depth heterogeneity, evaluation of overall membrane cleaning efficacy, among others. Results show that in the analysis of membranes and foulant layers: (i) applying a single technique may lead to incomplete or incorrect conclusions about composition or structure; (ii) RBS is the most advantageous technique for elemental analysis; (iii) EDS has important limitations, but is appropriate for evaluating overall elemental composition of foulant
Removal of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from water sources is of significant interest as many states have established limits. Three granular activated carbons (GACs) and a clay-based adsorbent, Fluoro-sorb ® 200 (FS200), were tested using rapid small scale column tests (RSSCTs) to compare relative performance of the media for PFAS removal. FS200 effluent was below detection for all PFAS except PFHxA at 300,000 bed volumes (BVs). The three GACs performed similarly except for PFBS and PFHxA. FS200 showed higher BVs to breakthrough, required a significantly shorter empty bed contact time, and had higher hydraulic loading rate, translating into a smaller footprint than GAC. This work provides important contributions to the water treatment literature, including RSSCT evaluation of FS200 media and media life comparison of GAC and FS200 in drinking water matrices with low PFAS and organic carbon concentrations.
Reactor hydraulics are integral to water treatment processes such as disinfection and chemical contaminant oxidation. This work uses reactor networksconceptual reactors arranged in parallel and series combinations-to simplify the accurate modeling of residence time in water treatment reactors. Reactor networks were selected for 14 clearwells, ozone contactors, clarifiers, and filters using tracer data sets from literature. For seven of 14 full-scale reactors, two parallel tanks-in-series reactors best balanced accuracy and simplicity. Reactor networks accurately represented tracer data using between two and eight fitting parameters, while segregated flow analysis required 32-164 inputs (two per tracer data point). The modeling work revealed that tracer data sets may have overestimated baffle factors by >10% in 10 of the 14 full-scale reactors, potentially as a result of inaccurate measurement of flow rate or volume. Applications of reactor networks include more accurate approaches to disinfection regulation and modeling the degradation of emerging contaminants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.