Background. Although older adults encompass almost half of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, it remains unclear which long-term hemodialysis vascular access type, arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, is optimal with respect to effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Clinical outcomes based on the initial AV access type have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. This pilot study tested the feasibility of randomizing older adults with advanced kidney disease to initial arteriovenous fistula versus graft vascular access surgery. Methods: Patients 65 years or older with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease or incident end-stage kidney disease and no prior arteriovenous vascular access intervention were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo surgical placement of a fistula or a graft after providing informed consent. Trial feasibility was evaluated as (i) recruitment of ≥70% of eligible participants, (ii) ≥50% to 70% of participants undergo placement of index arteriovenous access within 90 to 180 days of enrollment, respectively, (iii) ≥80% adherence to study-related assessments, and (iv) ≥70% of participants who underwent index arteriovenous access placement will have a follow-up duration of ≥12 months after index surgery date. Results: Between September 2018 and October 2019, 81% (44/54) of eligible participants consented and were enrolled in the study; 11 had pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease and 33 had incident or prevalent end-stage kidney disease. After randomization, 100% (21/21) assigned to arteriovenous fistula surgery and 78% (18/23) assigned to arteriovenous graft surgery underwent index arteriovenous access placement within a median (1st, 3rd quartile) of 5.0 (1.0, 14.0) days and 13.0 (5.0, 44.3) days, respectively, after referral to vascular surgery. The completion rates for studyspecific assessments ranged between 40.0 and 88.6%. At median follow-up of 215.0 days, 5 participants expired, 7 completed 12 months of follow-up, and 29 are actively being followed. Assessments of grip strength, functional independence and vascular access satisfaction were completed by >85% of patients who reached pre-specified post-operative assessment time point. Conclusions: Results from this study reveal it is feasible to enroll and randomize older adults with advanced kidney disease to one of two different arteriovenous vascular access placement surgeries. 4 The study can progress with minor protocol adjustments to a multisite clinical trial. Trial registration: Clinical Trials ID: NCT03545113. Registered June 4, 2018. Key Messages Regarding Feasibility 1) What uncertainties existed regarding the feasibility? No trial has objectively evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with advanced kidney disease based on the type of first hemodialysis arteriovenous vascular access placed. Hence, the feasibility of randomly assigning these patients to different surgical interventions for dialysis vascular access are unknown. Because this study focused on older patients with chronic disease, uncertaint...

Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are widely regarded as the preferred vascular access in hemodialysis (HD) patients due to their primary patency and patient survival benefits. Recent scholarship has suggested that the elderly population differs significantly from the general population in terms of inflammatory markers. What is more, recent studies have suggested that the elderly HD population is less likely to have an AVF placed as the initial vascular access compared to a younger cohort. The purpose of this study is to investigate the applicability of current vascular access guidelines to the elderly HD population. We hypothesized that the elderly HD population would derive less patency and survival benefit from AVF placement relative to arteriovenous graft (AVG) than the general population is known to derive. We performed a retrospective analysis using the US Renal Data System (USRDS) Wave II dataset to explore significant predictors of referral for intervention or access failure, and patient survival in the elderly US HD population using Cox regression corrected for race, gender, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and nutritional status. Of the 1471 HD patients with AVF or AVG, 764 patients were >65 years. Elderly diabetics had no significant mortality benefit from the use of AVF compared to AVG [odds ratio (OR) 1.34 (95% CI 0.92-1.95), p = 0.123]. Likewise, elderly nondiabetics had no significant mortality benefit from the use of AVF compared to AVG [OR 1.05 (95% CI 0.81-1.36), p = 0.735]. Elderly diabetics had no difference in odds for intervention referral for AVF compared to AVG [OR 1.49 (95% CI 0.76-2.9), p = 0.24]. Elderly nondiabetics had no difference in odds for intervention referral for AVF compared to AVG [OR 1.48 (95% CI 0.95-2.3), p = 0.08]. We conclude that the potential benefits derived from AVFs compared with AVGs and central venous catheters (CVC) may not apply universally. The recommendations of vascular access choice stipulated by national guidelines may need to be modified for elderly patients.

Vascular access complications, including thrombosis, are associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. Currently, up to 60% of new patients and 30% of prevalent patients are using a catheter for dialysis. To prevent interdialytic catheter thrombosis, these devices are routinely locked with concentrated heparin solutions. Several recent studies have elucidated the potential for abnormal coagulation markers (aPTT) that may arise from this practice. This abnormal elevation in aPTT may be explained by significant early and late leakage from the catheter that occurs after performing a catheter lock. To date no study has evaluated the impact of this practice, or the elevation in aPTT that may result from it, on bleeding complication rates. We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing bleeding rates in subjects who received concentrated heparin catheter lock (5000 u/cc) [group 1, n = 52] to those who received citrate or dilute heparin catheter lock (1000 u/cc) [group 2, n = 91] immediately after tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups except for the preprocedure INR, which was higher in the postpolicy group compared with the prepolicy group (1.29 vs. 1.21, p = 0.04). Results from logistic regression analyses revealed that the likelihood of a composite bleeding event in group 1 was 11.9 times that of a composite bleeding event in group 2, p = 0.04. Concentrated heparin (5000 u/ml) is associated with increased major bleeding complications posttunneled catheter placement compared with low-dose heparin (1000 u/ml) or citrate catheter lock solution, p = 0.02. Given the findings of this study, a randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of common anticoagulation lock solutions is warranted.

While hemodialysis access ligation has been used to manage pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead-induced central venous stenosis (CVS), percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) has also been employed to manage this complication. The advantages of PTA include minimal invasiveness and preservation of arteriovenous access for hemodialysis therapy. In this multi-center study we report the patency rates for PTA to manage lead-induced CVS. Consecutive PM/ICD chronic hemodialysis patients with an arteriovenous access referred for signs and symptoms of CVS due to lead-induced CVS were included in this analysis. PTA was performed using the standard technique. Technical and clinical success was examined. Technical success was defined as the ability to successfully perform the procedure. Clinical success was defined as the ability to achieve amelioration of the signs and symptoms of CVS. Both primary and secondary patency rates were also analyzed. Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent PTA procedure. Technical success was 95%. Postprocedure clinical success was achieved in 100% of the cases where the procedure was successful. The primary patency rates were 18% and 9% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 95%, 86%, and 73% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. On average, 2.1 procedures/year were required to maintain secondary patency. There were no procedure-related complications. This study finds PTA to be a viable option in the management of PM/ICD lead-induced CVS. Additional studies with appropriate design and sample size are required to conclusively establish the role of PTA in the management of this problem.

Our results suggest that there is no significant difference in catheter survival between percutaneous and surgical placement of PD catheters. Whether there are significant benefits from percutaneous placement in terms of peritonitis rates requires further robust studies. These findings have significant implications for future design of clinical trials in the placement of PD catheters and the delivery of dialysis-related services.