Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is known to improve microcirculation in various settings, but little is known about the impact of the amount of ischemic tissue mass or the limb itself. Since ischemia and subsequent necrosis of flaps is one of the most dreaded complications in reconstructive surgery, adjuvant methods to improve microcirculation are desirable. We therefore performed a randomized trial to compare the effect of arm versus leg ischemia for RIC of the cutaneous microcirculation of the antero-lateral thigh. Forty healthy volunteers were randomized to undergo 5 min of ischemia of either the upper or lower extremity, followed by 10 min of reperfusion.Ischemia was induced by a surgical tourniquet applied to the proximal limb, which was inflated to 250 mmHg for the upper and 300 mgHg for the lower extremity. This cycle was repeated a total of three times. Cutaneous microcirculation was assessed by combined laser doppler spectrophotometry on the antero-lateral aspect of the thigh to measure cutaneous blood flow (BF), relative hemoglobin content (rHb), and oxygen saturation (StO2). Baseline measurements were performed for 10 min, after which the ischemia/reperfusion cycles were begun. Measurements were performed continuously and were afterwards pooled to obtain a mean value per minute. Both groups showed significant increases in all three measured parameters of cutaneous microcirculation after three cycles of ischemia/reperfusion when compared to baseline (BF: 95.1% (P < 0.001) and 27.9% (P = 0.002); rHb: 9.4% (P < 0.001) and 5.9% (P < 0.001), StO2: 8.4% (P = 0.045) and 9.4% (P < 0.001). When comparing both groups, BF was significantly higher in the arm group (P = 0.019 after 11 min., P = 0.009 after 45 min). In conclusions, both ischemic conditioning of the upper and lower extremity is able to improve cutaneous BF on the ALT donor site. However, RIC of the upper extremity seems to be a superior trigger for improvement of cutaneous BF.

Background: The optimal therapy for deep burn wounds is based on the early debridement of necrotic tissue followed by wound coverage to avoid a systemic inflammatory response and optimize scar-free healing. The outcomes are affected by available resources and underlying patient factors, which represent challenges in burn care and suboptimal outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine optimal burn-wound management using enzymatic debridement (NexoBrid™, MediWound Germany GmbH, Rüsselsheim, Germany) and intact fish skin (Kerecis® Omega3 Wound, Isafjordur, Iceland). Methods: In this retrospective case series, 12 patients with superficial or deep dermal burn wounds were treated with enzymatic debridement followed by fish skin, Suprathel® (PolyMedics Innovations GmbH, Denkendorf, Germany), or a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Patients’ outcomes regarding healing and scar quality were collected objectively and subjectively for 12 months after the burn injury. Results: Wounds treated with fish skin demonstrated accelerated wound healing, a significantly higher water-storage capacity, and better pain relief. Furthermore, improved functional and cosmetic outcomes, such as elasticity, skin thickness, and pigmentation, were demonstrated. The pain and itch expressed as POSAS scores (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) for fish skin decreased compared to those for wounds managed with an STSG or Suprathel. Importantly, fish skin-treated wounds had significantly improved sebum production and skin elasticity than those treated with Suprathel but showed no significant superiority compared to STSG-treated wounds. Conclusions: Enzymatic debridement in combination with intact fish skin grafts resulted in the faster healing of burn wounds and better functional and aesthetic outcomes than split-thickness skin grafts and Suprathel treatment.

No abstract