Objective Long‐term weight loss is important and difficult to achieve for many women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Lifestyle interventions (LS) in PCOS have shown moderate short‐term effects. Three‐component LS that combine nutrition advice, exercise, and cognitive behavioral therapy have not been tested in long‐term interventions. Methods Women (N = 183) with PCOS who were trying to conceive and had BMI > 25 kg/m2 were assigned to 20 group sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy combined with nutrition advice and exercise (LS with or without Short Message Service [SMS] via mobile phone) or care as usual (CAU). Results More weight loss was observed in LS than in CAU (P < 0.001). Adding SMS was even more effective (P = 0.017). In CAU, 13 of 60 (21.8%) succeeded in achieving a 5% weight loss, as did 32 of 60 (52.8%) in LS without SMS and 54 of 63 (85.7%) in LS with SMS. The odds of achieving a 5% weight loss were 7.0 (P < 0.001) in LS compared with CAU. More than 18 of 60 (29.0%) of the women in CAU gained weight versus 5 of 60 (8.5%) and 2 of 63 (3.1%) in LS without or with SMS, respectively. The overall dropout rate was 116 of 183 (63.4%). Conclusions A three‐component LS program resulted in reasonable weight loss in women with PCOS. Adding SMS resulted in more weight loss.

Many women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) report high depression rates. The relationship between PCOS and these high depression rates is unclear. Two-component lifestyle interventions have revealed short-term effects on depression scores in this group of women. In general, 3-component interventions including diet, exercise, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are more effective in the long-term to improve emotional wellbeing. This has not yet been studied in women with PCOS. This study examined the effect of 20 CBT lifestyle (LS) sessions combined with a healthy diet and physical therapy with or without 9 months additional feedback through Short Message Service (SMS) via mobile phone, compared to care as usual (CAU, involving advice to lose weight). In this secondary analysis, 155 women with PCOS and a BMI above 25 kg/m 2 were eligible. Depression scores decreased significantly in the LS programme compared to CAU (P = 0.045). In both the LS programme without SMS (P = 0.036) and the LS programme with SMS (P = 0.011) depression scores decreased while no change was observed in CAU (P = 0.875). Selfesteem scores improved significantly in the LS programme compared to CAU (P = 0.027). No differences in body image scores were observed in LS participants compared to CAU (P = 0.087), although body image improved significantly in both the LS without SMS (P = 0.001) and with SMS (P = 0.008) study arms. We found no significant mediating role by androgens in the relationship between LS participants and emotional well-being. Only weight-loss mediated the relationship between LS and self-esteem. To conclude, a threecomponent lifestyle intervention programme with or without additional SMS resulted in significant improvements in depression and self-esteem compared to CAU, in women with PCOS, obesity, and a wish to achieve a pregnancy. Testosterone, androstenedione, DHEA, insulin, HOMA-IR, and cortisol did not mediate this effect. Weight loss mediated the effects

Background Eating behaviors like emotional eating, external eating and restrained eating play an important role in weight gain and weight loss in the general population. Improvements in eating behavior are important for long-term weight. This has not yet been studied in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). The aim of this study is to examine if a three-component lifestyle intervention (LI) is effective for improving disordered eating behavior in women with PCOS. Methods Women diagnosed with PCOS (N = 183), with a body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m2 and trying to achieve a pregnancy were either assigned to 1 year of 20 group sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) combined with nutritional advice and exercise with or without additional feedback through Short Message Service (SMS) or Care As Usual (CAU), which includes the advice to lose weight using publicly available services. Results The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDEQ) scores worsened in CAU (47.5%) and improved in the LI (4.2%) at 12 months. The difference between the LI and CAU was significant (P = 0.007) and resulted in a medium to large effect size (Cohen’s d: − 0.72). No significant differences were observed in EDEQ scores between LI with SMS compared to LI without SMS (Cohen’s d: 0.28; P = 0.399). Also, weight loss did not mediate the changes in eating behavior. An overall completion rate of 67/183 (36.6%) was observed. Conclusions A three-component CBT lifestyle program resulted in significant improvements in disordered eating behavior compared to CAU. Changes in disordered eating behavior are important for long-term weight loss and mental health. Trial registration: NTR, NTR2450. Registered 2 August 2010, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/2344