Two mock jury studies investigated whether jurors’ religious characteristics relate to verdicts and sentencing decisions. In Study 1, adding religious characteristics to a model with only demographics and authoritarianism increased the model’s explanatory power. Scoring high on devotionalism was significantly related to not guilty verdicts; scoring high on fundamentalism was significantly related to guilty verdicts. In both studies, being on a religious quest was significantly related to prodefendant legal decisions. Lawyers can use this information in jury selection. Further, authoritarianism was a mediator of the relationship between some religious variables and legal decisions, helping explain the underlying reasons for such relationships.
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has advanced in recent years and it is likely that the public's perceptions of such technology have changed over time. The use of ART by nontraditional women (e.g., single women, lesbians) has increased; thus, it is important to assess the public's attitudes toward in vitro fertilization (IVF), the most common ART, and the women who use such technology. The purpose of the study is to determine whether certain demographics, political and religious affiliations, and religious characteristics relate to approval of IVF use by nontraditional women. Undergraduate students were recruited from a public, medium-sized university in the western United States; 267 participants responded to multiple questions on an online survey. Using ordinary least square regression analyses, findings indicate that political affiliation is one of the strongest predictors, and that certain religious characteristics are more important in assessing attitudes than religious affiliation. Implications for assessing attitudes toward nontraditional women using IVF and inclusion of religious affiliation and characteristics in future studies are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.