Nowadays, goal of treatment approach in diffuse large B cell lymphoma is cure and first step towards it is to achieve complete remission. DLBCL is a potentially curable disease, with curability highly dependent on clinical and biological features. According to the WHO classification of Hematological Malignancies, the entity of DLBCL is characterized by rapidly growing mature B cell tumors with large or relatively large cells and /includes a number of disease variants/entities / encompassing several distinct clinopathologic diseases, several different histologic variants and clinical subtypes. There is no unique treatment for all patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Different subgroup of patients with DLBCL needs different treatment. In the pre-rutuximab era International Prognostic Index (IPI) was considered to be the most important prognostic factor for survival and the strongest indicator for identification of high-risk patients, who are unlikely to be cured with standard chemotherapy. Having in mind that IPI is based on 5 clinical characteristics (age, performance status, stage, extranodal involvement, LDH level) and it is constructed in the pre-rituximab is clear that R-IPI should be tested in rituximab era to provide any information of its validity. We retrospectively analyzed unselected population of 80 patients with confirmed diagnose of diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated at University hematology department in the period of 2005-2010. All patients were uniformly treated with R-CHOP regiment as initial treatment with curative intent. There were 80 patients with mean age 54, 5 years (15-84), male 35 and female 45. Older than 60 years were 29 patients (36, 25%). More than half of the patients (42) were diagnosed in advanced stage of the disease. We analyzed five prognostic factors: age, performance status, stage, extranodal involvement, LDH level and through the multifactorial analyses we selected two groups of patients. One with 0 to 2 factors as patients with low risk. Patients with more than 3 factors are considered as high risk. There is statistically significant difference in overall survival between two groups with five –years overall survival 70% for low risk patients and 47% for high risk. High-risk patients may be candidates for autologous transplantation as initial treatment, having in mind that in the rituximab era relapses occur very early in the first year and are difficult to be treated. R-IPI score is significant predictor and should be used for risk stratification of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. However, these findings should be validated prospectively in an independent population of patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin disease (LPHD) presents as early-stage disease with slow disease progression and excellent initial response to conventional chemotherapy. Although 96% of LPHD patients experience a complete remission (CR) upon first line treatment, many relapses occur. Residual tumor cells in Hodgkin’s patients can survive standard therapy and cause relapse. Thus, the elimination of minimal residual disease after first line treatment might improve the outcome in Hodgkin disease. CD20+ is strongly expressed by malignant cells in LPHD, but so far there is limited information regarding the efficacy of Rituximab in this patient population. A 66 year-old woman presented with bilateral inguinal lymphadenopathy in 2004 and complained on malaise and weight loss. Lymph node biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of LPHD and immunohistochemistry confirmed that CD20 antigen was expressed on more than 30% of malignant cells. Staging revealed II B disease. There were lymph node enlargements in the pelvis on CT. Her blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and albumin were normal with elevation of and lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phoshatase. She was treated with ABVD regiment 8 cycles and CR was achieved. After standard chemotherapy patient with CD20+ LPHD received four weekly doses of Rituximab at 375 mg/m2 and maintenance therapy with additional four doses of Rituximab every three months for the next year. Treatment was well tolerated without any complications. Evaluation of disease assessment included physical examination and computed tomography, bone marrow biopsy and routine analyses, after the end of treatment and every 3 months after for the first two years, and on six months for the following year. There were no abnormalities on CT after the end of the treatment. Patient was in complete remission. CT after 36 months showed no detectible tumor mass. Patient remains still in complete remission three years after chemotherapy without detectible tumor mass. Our case report suggests that Rituximab is both safe and effective in patients with CD20+ LPHD. The optimal treatment for patients with LPHD remains uncertain. Current research aims to identify alternative treatment approaches that possess significant activity but less toxicity. Radiotherapy for early-stage patients and chemotherapy or combined modality treatment for advanced-stage patients remains to be standard of care. Initial observed benefit of Rituximab treatment in this group of patients suggests that there is a role for monoclonal antibodies in optimal treatment approach, especially in improving the outcome. Further studies with Rituximab are warranted in this patient population.

Background: Multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria are increasingly frequent in HSCT recipients, but significant differences in etiology of bacterial infections and prevalence of resistant strains exist between different transplant centers Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli, Vancomicyn resistant enterococci, Penicillin-resistant Pneumococci Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and are major problem to manage. Aims: Aim: to evaluate the frequency of multidrug resistant bacteria in our center. Methods: During a 19 years period we have transplanted 500 patients with different hematological malignant and nonmalignant diseases. All patients were treated in sterile room conditioned with HEPA filters and low bacterial diet. Antibacterial prophylaxis consisted Ciprofloxacine 1,0gr/day. As empirical antibiotics regimen we administered combination of third-generation cephalosporin + amynoglicoside, while as second line therapy Imipenem+Vancomycin Results: in every patient 3 times a week we monitor: blood culture, central venous catheter culture, sputum, urine culture. From all 288 bacterial isolates the distribution of MDR bacteria were: ESBL positive Escherichia coli 3 (0,10%) VR Enterococcus 2(0,06%) MDR Pseudomonas aer. 1 (0,03%) Klebsiella aerogenes 2 (0,06%) MRSA 17(0,06%) Acinetobacter baumanii 2(0,06%) Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia 2(0,06%). There were fatal outcome due to sepsis in 3 patients (VRE 1, MDR Pseudomonas 1, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 1). Summary/Conclusion: The monitoring of local microflora is crucial for every transplant center. Empirical first-line therapy must be individualized and according to ECIL 4 escalation and de-escalation strategy is necessery for better outcome in this group of immunocompromised patients.

4595 Despite advances in our understanding of its pathogenesis, acute myeloblastic leukemia remains difficult to treat. Although initial complete remission can be achieved in a high percentage of patients, relapse occurs in 70–80% of the patients. Two main approaches have been the attempt to eradicate the leukemic clonal cells population via chemotherapy with or without autologous stem cell rescue or to pursue a combined approach using an antileukemic therapy combined with an antileukemic immune response via allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Autologous transplantation compares favorably against allogeneic bone marrow transplant in several ways. Autologous transplantation can be used as a consolidation therapy in the older population, and lack of a matched donor does not preclude the patients from this treatment. We report a retrospective analysis on 48 patients diagnosed with de novo AML, who did not have an available histocompatible donor, and who underwent autologous transplantation between years 2000–2009 at the University hematology Clinic, Skopje, Macedonia. All patients had ECOG score 1 or less. The patient's age ranged from 17 to 65 years with the median age 41 years. There were 26 males and 22 females. For stem cell mobilization patients received chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The preparative chemotherapy regimen prior to autologous transplantation consisted of BuCy in 24 patient, BEAM in 22 and BuCyMel was used in the remaining 2 patients. We used bone marrow as primary source of stem cells in 18 patients, and peripheral blood stem cells in remaining 30 patients. The five years overall survival was 52% and the 5 years disease progression free survival were 42%. We analyzed sever factors that can influence the overall survival and the disease free survival such as: age, disease status, stem cell source, chemotherapy regiments prior to transplantation, conditioning regiments, number of mobilized stem cells. Advanced age and bone marrow stem cell source seems to be more influent factors. We report that the clinical results of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are sufficiently encouraging to warrant future trials that include autologous transplantation as an option for appropriately selected patients with AML in CR1. We conclude that autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a reasonable and save intensive consolidation for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia who do not have a suitable HLA–matched donor. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

No abstract