Background: Burnout during residency may be a function of intense professional demands and poor work/life balance. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, NYC hospital systems were quickly overwhelmed, and trainees were required to perform beyond the usual clinical duties with less supervision and limited education. Objective: The present longitudinal study examined the effects of COVID-19 caseload over time on burnout experienced by resident physicians and explored the effects of demographic characteristics and organizational and personal factors as predictors of burnout severity. Methods: This study employed a prospective design with repeated measurements from April 2020 to June 2020. Participants were surveyed about their well-being every 5 days. Predictors included caseload, sociodemographic variables, self-efficacy, hospital support, perceived professional development, meaning in work, and postgraduate training level. Results: In total, 54 resident physicians were recruited, of whom 50% reported burnout on initial assessment. Periods of higher caseload were associated with higher burnout. PGY-3 residents reported more burnout initially but appeared to recover faster compared to PGY-1 residents. Examined individually, higher self-efficacy, professional development, meaningful work, and hospital support were associated with lower burnout. When all four predictors were entered simultaneously, only self-efficacy was associated with burnout. However, professional development, meaningful work, and hospital support were associated with self-efficacy. Conclusion: Burnout among residency is prevalent and may have implications for burnout during later stages of a physician’s career. Self-efficacy is associated with lower burnout and interventions to increase self-efficacy and the interpersonal factors that promote self-efficacy may improve physician physical and emotional well-being.

Objectives Clinicians report training deficits in advance care planning (ACP), including limits to their understanding of cultural/spiritual influences on patient decision-making and skills in interdisciplinary teamwork. This study describes Advance Directives-Live Action Simulation Training (AD-LAST), an interdisciplinary experiential and didactic training program for discussing ACP and end-of-life (EOL) care. AD-LAST highlights cultural/spiritual variations in medical decision-making. Methods Prospective educational cohort study with pre-post intervention survey. AD-LAST incorporated standard curricular tools for didactic and experiential training in ACP/EOL communication. Study conducted in an urban community teaching hospital in Queens, NY, one of the most diverse counties in the USA. Participants included physicians, house staff, nurses, therapists, and other disciplines. AD-LAST format was a one-day workshop. The morning focused on didactic teaching using widely available curricular tools. The afternoon involved experiential practice with standardized patient-actors. Pre-post intervention questionnaires assessed ACP operational knowledge and self-efficacy (i.e., self-confidence in skills) in ACP and EOL communication. Repeated measure ANOVAs evaluated changes from pretest to posttest in knowledge and self-efficacy. Results A total of 163 clinical staff participated in 21 AD-LAST training sessions between August 2015 and January 2019. Participants displayed a significant increase from pretest to posttest in total knowledge (p < 0.001), ACP procedural knowledge (p < 0.001), ACP communication/relationships knowledge (p < 0.001), and self-efficacy (p < 0.001). Knowledge and self-efficacy were not correlated and represented independent outcomes. Postprogram evaluations showed greater than 96% of participants were highly satisfied with AD-LAST, especially the opportunity to practice skills in real-time and receive feedback from members of other professional groups. Significance of results AD-LAST, a multifaceted training program deployed in an interdisciplinary setting, is effective for increasing ACP knowledge and self-efficacy, including the capacity to address cultural/spiritual concerns. The use of standard tools facilitates dissemination. The use of case simulations reinforces learning.

No abstract